Clearly Bond Girl disagrees with Whitney (I'll side with Bond Girl). There will be defaults, but they probably will not lead to anything on the scale that Whitney is predicting with "hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of defaults".
The issue is containment. While the much higher than normal defaults over the next two years are entirely market events the danger lies in tying to prevent them from occurring. That way leads to moral hazard as other municipalities will attempt to eschew their responsibilities.
States are probably in more trouble than cities.
States will withhold shared funding and cities will file BK.
Although no matter how much the states keep in funding - it won't be enough.
There will be massive job cuts for all states, cities and counties.
Many services will be cut or stopped, starting of course with kids, elderly and the handicaped.
Over the holidays, there was a conversation at the table about a list that was published in a fairly popular newspaper, with the 100 most likely cities to default. A nearby large area was in there(over 150K pop)
Clearly Bond Girl disagrees with Whitney (I'll side with Bond Girl). - CR
Me too. Or I would if I understood her posts. Her übernerdiness is well beyond my pay grade.
Bond Girl has one thing wrong however. She cites the supposedly low level of indebtedness of most US states and municipalities. The debt she uses is out of context. If California only had California's debt we'd be rich beyond even Sacramento's avarice.
Bond Girl wrote a good post on bonds. I actually grasped part of it. There are basically two types of muni bonds. One is paid by an existing revenue stream. One is paid by taxes.
I was just in 7-11. The Commonwealth of VA is now charging a .50 tax on each phone card purchased. It always sucks to be poor.
That is included in my austerity measures for next year, josap. People are under some illusion that those tax cuts they all just got are going to save them. They aren't going to be so happy next year when they find out how they're going to pay for them. Everyone wants government workers pay cut or jobs eliminated. This will result in more unemployment, less spending and more misery for everyone but the top 2%. At some point we reach the breaking point. Will the cops be excited about stopping riots when they had their pay slashed and benefits cut?
That is the Arizona model. We will steal, beg, and borrow at the state level, and the municipalities will bear the burden, and some bonds will go unpaid. Wilbur Ross will lose some money insuring that dreck, but so be it.
I suspect the first big city in AZ to blow will be Glendale- their finances thanks to the stadium deals is in pathetic shape.
As for the nation, let there be layoffs!!!
Galtistan is an anarchosyndicalist collective run with a rotating executive council....
Illinois, California and several other states are at increasing risk of being the first states to default since the 1930s.
...
States and cities have nearly $3 trillion in outstanding bonds, and more than $3.5 trillion in shortfalls to pensions.
I am confused and that is probably no surprise to many of you. What I can't understand is that is they any coinnection between the governments pension obligations and its bond obligation, If there is it would seem that according to many and perhaps Bond Girl too Mish is sounding the trumpet over pension problems at least a year away and the inference is probably more. In other words Mish don't get them in a twist. If Mish is correct would not a bankruptcy pull down the bonds too. In other words does the pension problem as seen by Mish impact on the bond problem and if not why not? I told you I am confused. Thank you.
It has always been that way, as it is hard to accumulate enough to just rent a house while just scraping by. Any illness, or bad behavior pretty much scuttles any chance to make it back into the working class, let alone the middle class.
The hard part is to keep gaining any savings when so many things come up and knock you back. I have seen a lot of people climb out, but painfully over time. I have also seen a lot crash and burn, never to really surface. When adversity is encountered, people find out what kind of friends and family they have invested in, and what kind of safety net they have.
Ironically, a lot of the rich crash harder than the rest of us, because they thought they were immune- Randy Quaid comes to mind. The VF article this month about being chased by starwhackers is priceless.
I side with Meredith Whitney although don't think it will as severe.
$2tn debt crisis threatens to bring down 100 US cities | Business | The Guardian
New Jersey governor Chris Christie summarised the problem succinctly: "We spent too much on everything. We spent money we didn't have. We borrowed money just crazily. The credit card's maxed out, and it's over. We now have to get to the business of climbing out of the hole. We've been digging it for a decade or more. We've got to climb now, and a climb is harder."
California is the worst state in absolute terms. In per capita terms, Illinois appears to be in the worst shape. However that statement does not factor in all of New Jersey's pension plans. Then again, the Biggs report does not include all of Illinois' public pension plans either. The mess everywhere is far bigger than it looks.
Basket cases = CA, IL, NY, NJ, OH, TX
Close to basket cases = FL, PA
Yay scone! It's pretty darn chilly down here today as well. Yesterday was rainy and cold but today we at least had some sun. I'm thinking fireplace and eggnog this evening.
Guess the question is "Who holds the bonds of cities (or states) most likely to default?"
What is the domino effect when the bond holders no longer have those assets or the cash flow they depended on?
And most importantly why the hell should taxpayers in the other 42 states pay for these basket case and close to basket cases that have allowed their state and local gubmint citizens to live large for past 30 yrs.
Thanks, guys. Alas, no eggnog for me, I'm already on a post-feast diet. However, RADAR kinda looks like a lot of the storm will pass NE of Cape Cod, right through Martha's Vineyard. I could be wrong.
Hark! Hubster Dude The Dude Abides has got the generator working, just in case it really is Snowpocalypse! Blame it on the snow
Snowing pretty good here scone. I just checked the weather buoy about 25 miles offshore. The barometer is dropping like a rock and the winds are pretty strong. I already see some drifts approaching 2 to 3' while other areas are bare due to the high wind.
I am with you km4 no one is mentioning let alone considering the impact of the the pension problem. It appears that the pension problem in this context is as the Sainted Poret said it like the crazy aunt in the attic. Thank you.
I still get the feeling that large number of quasi-state bonds are papering over their shortfalls with creative accounting. Just hoping and praying it will work out before they have to report how bad it really is.
Will 2011 be a big enough bumper crop of tax payers money to make that happen is the real question for me at least.
Many services will be cut or stopped, starting of course with kids, elderly and the handicaped.
Yep, but "essential" services will be maintained--such as subsidizing commercial air flights. While city employees have been laid off, city streets get less maintenance, the new water treatment plant (for which a general obligation bond levy raised funds) has a 2 million cost overrun (partly because somehow the planners managed to ignore known geologic instabilities in the new plant's location), and maintenance of city parks is neglected (said parks are used by the all important tourists, so maintenance "matters") a city council member can still say he thinks the city can "find" enough money to continue a 1 1/2 year state subsidy of 4 commercial flights to PDX. At this time, the subsidy comes to a little over $110/per passenger/per flight.
The 10 passenger plane (and you don't go through any security procedures to board) carries an "average" of 3.5 passengers/flight.
It's important to keep your priorities straight in these parlous days.
And most importantly why the hell should taxpayers in the other 42 states pay for these basket case and close to basket cases that have allowed their state and local gubmint citizens to live large for past 30 yrs.
Because when the time came to make a decision to be an independent state, or suck off the teet of big govt EVERY STATE chose to suck on that teet.
Show me the one state that decided to make its own drinking law, and turned down the federal funding that required the states set the law at the recommended 21 yrs old.
Taking from a national pool of money also means they are on the hook in bad times too. sorry.
the city can "find" enough money to continue a 1 1/2 year state subsidy of 4 commercial flights to PDX. At this time, the subsidy comes to a little over $110/per passenger/per flight.
The 10 passenger plane (and you don't go through any security procedures to board) carries an "average" of 3.5 passengers/flight.
Whos brother in law owns that airline/plane?
What a total waste.
Bond default is BB's line in the sand. Will never allow that to happen as it would set a very unfortunate precedent in his mind no matter if it is muni, state, or federal. He and Timmay wouldn't be able to fund debt with more debt if nobody had any confidence in said debt. Look for some very creative ways (printing) to literally paper over any cracks if and when they appear. Of course these will have consequence later but who cares about later.
As I understand it Tommy Vu that in order to give the pensions a haircut you legally need a bakruptcy. Now won't a bankruptcy have impact on those muni bonds? Thank you.
but in terms of actual direct compensation, Harvard endowment fund managers are employees of the school. and there is no question that the endowment structure could not exist without massive government subsidies.
Of course, if it violated the 90-10 standard, they should face compensation caps too.
Whether private Harvard should lose non-profit tax status is certainly topical, but distinct from the issue of whether for-profit colleges should keep large government subsidies.
You should have seen them at this year's county Republican party. Never did I see a bunch of happier people. It is almost like they are doing good things locally! (which is wrong)
.
On the bright side, the local Republican party may be a good driver for bringing out a 3rd party/non-partisan vote for county & metro affairs--thanks to the state Republican party.
Given the current political climate, I can very easily see a repeat of '08 in all of this.
I can easily see a bunch of pissed off Republicans refusing to offer the guarantee, the containment.
Just like Lehman brothers, but much bigger.
I can see that.
I can't - its their buddies at the country clubs holding the bonds. Way too close to home to stand in the way of that crowd.
But maybe some union pension will squeal first - just so as to give them some cover.
I'm having eggnog...with Captain Morgan Spiced Rum. The congestion from my cold/sinus infection or whatever it is that's been making me miserable for a week has moved from my eye to my teeth. I'm not sure if that's progress or not. Hubby is sick now, too. We tried to watch the new Wallstreet movie last night using On Demand with Comcast but for whatever reason the movie never did play. I tried to get a free one and that didn't work either. Hopefully they won't charge me the 4.99 for the movie we didn't get to see.
Whos brother in law owns that airline/plane?
What a total waste.
When this town & another on the coast (the small towns filed for the state transportation grant jointly) initially asked for bids from airlines to handle these flights, the process down here was so suspect that (due to pressure from the city commissioners in the other town--which had just gotten through a political influence scandal) the bidding process was redone. A different airline other than the one initially favored by a few members of my city's council was chosen. Since then the airport manager has been fired (after a previous mess during which he was placed on administrative leave--and the city manager left & a city council member quit early after a closed council session), & last I heard was suing the city for unjust termination, and the hired airline has violated one provision of its agreement (one that some think was kinda important) but the city's attorneys had ever so intelligently failed to include a monetary PENALTY for violating/failing to comply with this provision . . . ..
It's nobody's bro-in-law, but when the city council (in closed sessions) decided to buy the stupid airport several years ago (2007 or 2008) so it wouldn't go under, I thought it was mostly because they wanted to make sure they & their well off friends had a place to keep their planes & helicopters and socialize. Even better if the taxpayers in this city of about 12,000-13,000 subsidized their costs.
Just before the then airport manager was placed on administrative leave, a FAA guy from PDX came down, took a little tour of the airport (it's a small general aviation airport) and told me what a "well run airport" it was.
US Muni Bond Market size 2.7 trillion ( source Roubini),
Cumulative default rate: .001 to .003 ( source wiki )
That gives 2.7 billion to 8.1 billion - which is where Joe Mysack is at so I can see where he's coming from. But thats using past history - right until it isn't ( that isn't just a cute phrase, nor is past performance is no predictor of future performance). Given that I can see where Mysack is coming from, and that these are definitely not ordinary times and that the process is:
first shaft the poor people ( retirees, transfer-payment/service recipients ).
2(a) Only after they are thoroughly pissed off, (2b)do you shaft Mr. MoneyBags.
1 is already happening. 2.a not yet..
What's the election cycle for munipical elections?
I need to understand that before I side with the Whitney view
You can use this link Marine Weather : Weather Underground to select a region and once you do that you can drill down to forecasts for both nearshore and offshore. Within the drill down area you will see blue dots that when you put your mouse pointer over them will display a number for that buoy - click on it and it will give you a variety of weather and sea state data.
Have fun.
EDIT I see AB and KK beat me to it. That's what I get for responding before reading thru to the end.
Isn't it obvious that obligations beyond reality won't be paid?
When we Weimar, and it is when in my mind, no longer if, we will settle these with money worth darn near nothing. Because the folks in charge think they can kick the can a little further.
Rich folks and retirees own most of the muni bonds in America because of the tax benefits.
That loss of income and wealth will be a very interesting effect.
These people vote too - fun times - make the teabaggers look like boy scouts.
See ya - gonna go to a hockey game where the violence really is 'contained'. Get to sit outside the glass and drink - be a very different experience to be sitting among them dodging pucks and bodies, trying not to spill... like in the economy.
Unless they're union, in which case the administrator deserves all he can chisel
I was going to go there 'cause I've already been tagged as a shill and apologist. I'm just thankful I wasn't tagged a Conservative and/or Liberal!
.
You would think that voters would start bristling anytime someone talks about Education or "For The Children", but we aren't there yet. Either we have too many children, too many people's salaries tied to children, or too much time to obsess about other people's children. We can only hope those IL pensions will get axed and all those poor administrators will get only to keep their millions in salary over the years of their employment.
If that didn't reek of corruption and kickbacks, I don't know what does. No biggie 'cause I'm starting to side with AllenM. Hello, Weimar, here we come! Just like where we started from!
Some municipalities are definitely doing better with hotel tax (transient occupancy tax) and sales tax. Some new businesses are filling the holes that Mervyn's and American automakers left, but I still see a lot of small businesses and strip mall businesses going under.
From the raw numbers, the Illinois pension looks to be the worst of all the states, with NJ and CA also in a big hole. The politics in each state will determine who will pay for the pension losses (pensioners or tax payers or some combination). It looks like NJ is going to force some losses on pensioners.
I should qualify the "doing better" part for municipalities. Most still have hiring freezes, deferred or no COLAs, and many are actively working on a two tier pension system with new hires getting lower benefits. Lower future property taxes will be another hit so it really is a mixed bag.
Oh, that the Greeks have totally lost any sense of community and are done to every person for himself/his family/herfamily.
Including a monastery on Mount Athos where the monks did some stuff which they clearly don't think was wrong, but apparently was. Read the article.
She cites the supposedly low level of indebtedness of most US states and municipalities. The debt she uses is out of context.
and who amongst us would posit no cascade effect, pin action to CDS, after CDS leaned against another, inextricably woven to a fabric stretched to the point of tensile strength
Clearly Bond Girl disagrees with Whitney (I'll side with Bond Girl). - CR
I haven't seen a thing to convince me that any public debtholders will take haircuts. I'd turn it around on Meredith and ask why she thought moral hazard would stop at this particular high-water mark.
99 weeks of bond fund inflows have come to an end, and the bond bull is gasping shallow breaths. Even Pimco has had its fill. Seems to me like it doesn't really have to do with anything other than identifying the turn. You can shout taxing authority till you are blue in the face, but the money is no longer going to chase bonds until such time as panic out is fully recognized by Mr Market, and then when all the little chicken littles have crowded the exits will the slippery foxes sneak in for a fill of golden eggs.
I saw True Grit last night. Thought it was pretty good.
As to the muni and state bond defaults, the Fed gov
will print,print, print, with the appropriate string attached
so that power flows to DC. That is one stimulus that
will stave off deflation. If they don't, Katie bar the door.
My church is about to make a deal with a nonprofit developer to build "affordable" senior housing on some unused property adjacent to the church complex. The usual deal: investors receive federal tax credits, the developer manages and controls the development for 50 years, the church gets a little something up front and title in 50 years. I've been through this before with another congregation.
Churches like to go with senior housing in deals like this because, well, a plurality of the congregation often is senior, and they're seen as less trouble around the campus than low-income families or the handicapped.
The problem with this class of senior housing is hitting the sweet spot; prospective residents have to make less than X amount per year to qualify, but the rent is still too expensive for most of the people who'd otherwise qualify. It's hard to keep places like this full. And yet the developer's happy to charge ahead full speed; the financing is there, after all. I guess nonprofit developers aren't any different than the for-profit type in that regard. This particular outfit is a bit of an empire-builder. Just hoping this particular empire doesn't collapse.
fully recognized by Mr Market, and then when all the little chicken littles have crowded the exits will the slippery foxes sneak in for a fill of golden eggs.
Not a criticism of your economics, but is there a mixed metaphor award - like a plaque or a cup or something?
She cites the supposedly low level of indebtedness of most US states and municipalities. The debt she uses is out of context.
and who amongst us would posit no cascade effect, pin action to CDS, after CDS leaned against another, inextricably woven to a fabric stretched to the point of tensile strength
California may only have "California" debt service amounts Sold/Not Yet Repaid: ~$65 billion. , Approved/Not Yet Sold: ~$54 billion but they are also responsible for ~20% of the Fed $12T and its residents are also responsible for their local municipal debt and all this in an already crushing tax environment.
Any excessive failure and as you say; cascade contagion. And make no mistake, the Pimpcos of the world will use any market stress to rip off the rest of the market. Never waste a crisis.
Churches like to go with senior housing in deals like this because, well, a plurality of the congregation often is senior....
Our Archdiocese here in the DC area has been very successful at this sort of project for decades.
There are also the very much in play Little Sisters of the Poor, who when things get tough simply beg and wait on God's Providence. It seems to work very well. Their senior residences from what we've seen on a visit are means tested and very attractive and well run - cheerful, actually.
I doubt that Vanity Fair knows a monastery from a mezze.
No doubting Thomas ( one of the lesser known ( wonder why ) disciples - who can name all 12 ? ) here - no siree.
For the others: here's the article again ( does VF have -ve connotations - how weird - its not as if we are buying Playboy for the "articles" is it ? )
I honestly think that Pavel would like the article.
As a (former) title atty, I am fasinated by the fact that the Greeks have no title registry system at all. And the monks dug up some really ancient deed from 600 or so years ago, and then played swap the land with the government.
It sound like, effectively, there is no government in Greece, and hasn't been since. . . . who knows when?
I'm not going to read an article that from the beginning tells me what I already knew, calls Jesus Prayer beads "prayer beads", and doesn't go to Mount Athos to attend a Mass.
It isn't clear to me from the article that the monks actually did anything morally wrong, mostly the appearance of impropriety, and the Greek gov't & society is such a morass of corruption that you can't exist there without being morally wrong. Kinda like the Soviet Union, actually.
I think you are fixating on trivialities and missing a good article.
I have to pile in a bit on the "Today its all about Money crowd ".
Got news for you: it is called CAPITALism for a reason.
If it would be about People and Society it would be called SOCIALism..
Not that hard really...
Btw, ever wondered why Capitalism got really ugly AFTER the fall of the Soviet Union??
My Theorie is they didnt need to compete with the social part anymore...
“These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon (who is called Peter) and his brother Andrew; James son of Zebedee, and his brother John; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Him.” The Bible also lists the twelve disciples/apostles in Mark 3:16-19 and Luke 6:13-16. A comparison of the three passages shows a couple of minor differences in the names. It seems that Thaddaeus was also known as “Judas, son of James” (Luke 6:16) and Lebbaeus (Matthew 10:3). Simon the Zealot was also known as Simon the Canaanite (Mark 3:18). Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Jesus, was replaced in the twelve apostles by Matthias (see Acts 1:20-26). Some Bible teachers view Matthias as an “invalid” apostle and believe that Paul was God's choice to replace Judas Iscariot as the twelfth apostle.
Maybe I should have trusted the wiki - which adds on Barnabas, Andronicus, Junia, Silas, Timothy and Apollos. ( although it goes on to add a dozen or more for later centuries )
But I thought - wiki, yeah right what do they know.. lets stick to what's from the horses mouth ( and confirmation bias of course ) .
So, who's the 13th then ? Jesus doesn't count ( but he does save) - that's reflexive.
**We did not avoid a second Great Depression because we bailed out financial institutions. Rather, the collapse in the economy and the surge in unemployment were the direct result of a gaping hole in the U.S. regulatory structure that prevented the rapid restructuring of insolvent non-bank financials. Policy makers then inappropriately extended the "too big to fail" doctrine to ordinary banks. Following a striking loss of public confidence that resulted from arbitrary policy responses, coupled with fear-mongering by exactly those who stood to benefit from public handouts, the self-fulfilling crisis was contained by a change in accounting rules that effectively disabled capital requirements for all financial companies. **
I'm not going to read an article that from the beginning tells me what I already knew, calls Jesus Prayer beads "prayer beads", and doesn't go to Mount Athos to attend a Mass.
Some Bible teachers view Matthias as an “invalid” apostle
was he crippled?
Good point. I just automatically read it as in those fatal error messages one gets ( not me of course, my code is 100% USDA certified as error free) - "Invalid page" ( hmm I think Mark Foley said that ) , "Invalid handle" ( jeez I think Mark foley said THAT too ) . I'll stop as I can sense I'm moving into 4chan mode.
Fear of the future if they did. Plus, one would assume that one person couldn't make a decision like this. As a rule of thumb, if there is more than one person involved there will be disagreement and politics involved. Politics will keep all problems involving pain from being solved.
Finances are a wreck, a total wreck, with debt on top of debt.
Yep, and I think they used up all the accounting tricks, push backs, pull forwards, check the couch cushions they can manage. Cut services big time, raise fees big time, beg for tax increases or raise if a vote not needed, is what 2011 will be all about.
I wonder how many of us here feel anxiety about their own personal financial circumstances. I'm not at all suggesting a poll. But perhaps such personal concerns might very well influence the mood in this forum.
But perhaps such personal concerns might very well influence the mood in this forum.
Of course they do, how could it be any other way? We all see the world from our own small viewing stand first. Sure we can see larger landscapes, but those are colored by our own background lighting.
There was probably no other path to take. The mantra of deregulation was easy to preach as most people can't comprehend (refuse to admit) how corrupt and sleazy those at the top (the MOST worthy of society and our dear leaders) really are. So, selling the deregulation to worshipping peasants wasn't very hard.
Cut services big time, raise fees big time, beg for tax increases or raise if a vote not needed, is what 2011 will be all about.
Big trouble for the low wage earners. Gas 3.10 at the pump in DC this morning. Trouble right there with what one might call a fee and a tax. Cuts net income to the bone and beyond for low wage people.
Two seemingly unrelated developments in the nations mortgage mess this past week. They both point to how difficult it will be to bring some stability back to the system. I am wondering if they are connected.
...
The first came as a surprise to me. Mr. Joseph Smith was supposed to be confirmed as the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Authority. Smith was a state banking commissioner from North Carolina. He was a White House pick. Up until last week I thought he was a shoe-in for the job. Kaboom.
Smith is out. Nixed at the last minute by none other than Richard Shelby (R. AL). The ranking member of Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs waved his arms and sent Smith back to North Carolina. Senator Shelby had this to say:
'Shelby's main concern was that Smith would be a “lapdog” to outside pressure to use the GSEs, at taxpayer expense, as vehicles for large-scale homeowner assistance programs.'
...
The CBO did have one recommendation that I thought could be very useful. They want the government to recognize UP FRONT a mark to market cost of providing a mortgage. This cost would go on the budget as a current expense. The Administration and Congress would fight over all aspects of the budget (as usual) but if they had an agenda for housing (stimulus/support) they would have to appropriate the money and vote on it where all could see the results.
...
If you’re a conservative and you want to see a smaller role for government the CBO proposal on mortgages is the ticket for you. I can’t help but connect the dots between Shelby’s "no" vote on Thursday and the CBO report from the same day.
In case you missed it, the Republicans complained about the evils of 'regulation' in virtually every bill passed by the 111th Congress.
Still, substantial legislative progress was made, despite the carping, including the Dodd-Frank (Financial Reform) Bill.
What regulation? The day Dodd-Frank passed, the TBTF's stocks were up , what 2-3%?
I wonder how many of us here feel anxiety about their own personal financial circumstances.
I suspect that when things "get bad" I will be screwed financially. There will be some event in the future which will essentially steal the remaining loot from the savers to "save society". It must happen. The nobility can spread their loot around the globe, the peasants can't.
In case you missed it, the Republicans complained about the evils of 'regulation' in virtually every bill passed by the 111th Congress.
Still, substantial legislative progress was made, despite the carping, including the Dodd-Frank (Financial Reform) Bill.
O gawd here we go again - the team takes to the field to point out that, rabid, fleabitten, crippled mangy though it may be, its STILL a dog. It may emit smelly farts but since its by the team it smells of roses.
From limping along with my law practice in Miami, and listening to all the horrible stories, to returning here where the house is paid for, the credit card bills are nearly always paid before any interest accrues, and can pretty much buy what I like. At this point I would like less clutter!
Just a question....what is stopping California from just defaulting?
Inertia and the perception that there's still loot and sheeple to shear and a feeling that there's always packing up the kids and escaping. There's also 10m here who aren't exposed to the consequences because they are consumers not producers and another 5m who are above being touched.
pavel.chichikov - I wonder how many of us here feel anxiety about their own personal financial circumstances.
I for one who is doing very well, (on track at least) am very anxious over my personal finances. I have been poor, working class and what most would call middle class and I realize how easily I can fall all the way down again.
My response for the last four to five years has been to eliminate debt just because I no longer trusted the banks to play fair. Then I started saving like a miser. Getting no return, but I have finally gotten to or above the levels of savings that is recommended by most people. Some are just far too extreme, and seems to think everyone needs 10 million to retire. Who knows, they may be right.
Many of the comments in that thread show just how far into nevernever land many blogs in the die-hard camp are...
(edit: because many posters are asking what was the original poster thinking to come to that conclusion, not because the comments are that way)
as far as the ? I've seen more pleasant discourse in their comment sections recently, and Im not afraid to admit that I read both of them with as unbiased an eye as possible.
thin line between affordability and assistance programs...
Wonder how many of the unemployed took the loans from the gov to pay the mortgage for up to 2 years. Full recourse, ugly payment plan later, lots of paper work to fill out, do many qualify?
Something along the lines described by the CBO is coming. Barney Frank does not have the influence or the votes to stop it. Strong hands like Shelby will get their way. While the actual outcome is cloudy there is one conclusion you can take to the bank. Mortgages are going to be more difficult to get and they will cost more in twelve months. That will hurt, but it is a good thing.
And IMO a slap in the face to Ben 'the QE pusher' Bernank
"Assessed taxable property values in Nye County dropped from $1.4 billion in the final tax roll for 2009, to $862 million for 2010. That’s the lowest level since the 2002-03 fiscal year."
shucks darn - my property taxes will decrease. It's about time.
If the nobility can use the Fed to create inflation (hidden or real) to force the peasants to payoff their debts your "safe investments" might mean you will need 10 million to retire. The method used to steal will be very simple and invisible to the peasants (as it must be). The predator humans will eat as many of the prey as they need to survive.
I just clicked on fhe Michelle Bachmann ad. There's nothing specific on it in terms of policy that I can see, besides repealing some things.
Does anyone actually know how to climb out of this trench?
Mortgages are going to be more difficult to get and they will cost more in twelve months. That will hurt, but it is a good thing.
And housing values will go where?
And how many more will be underwater?
And how many more jobs lost?
And how many more homes lost?
Pushing values where?
I wish everyone with a mortgage would just stop paying in January. Then we can get this over with after a few years of GDII
This is perversely good news for everyone that wants cheap houses. Because there will be no financing, there will be a much smaller housing market, with a lot fewer dollars spent on housing.
Nice idea- small government, I guess that there will be no Realtor sponsored donations for Shelby, as they realize how he was screwed them. Austerity is good for you!
Perhaps you missed the context. Tommy Vu, a well know long time Obama basher (who claims to have been an Obama supporter up until two months BEFORE he was inaugurated), had to bash Obama in a rather gratuitous fashion in response to my comment about regulatory inaction under the previous administration.
My response to which you took exception was to point out to him (while ignoring his gratuitous bashing) that the Republicans in Congress still did all they could over the past two years to complain about anything remotely connected with regulation of any kind.
This board has long been populated by Republicans and their supporters. Bitch, bitch, bitch is all they do, perhaps all they can do. Pardon me for pointing out who caused the Great Recession from we are now emerging.
BTW, in response to CR's blog post, Obama's ARRA is looking better every day. It just wasn't large enough to get us all the way back, but then the Republican senators whose votes were needed to pass it at all put a hard cap on the number of dollars.
These are just the facts. Sorry if you find them upsetting.
This board has long been populated by Republicans and their supporters. Bitch, bitch, bitch is all they do, perhaps all they can do. Pardon me for pointing out who caused the Great Recession from we are now emerging.
There is no pardon and certainly no excuse for the tone, tenor and direction with which you present your political biases.
@Citizen AllenM wrote on Sun, 12/26/2010 - 3:06 pm (in reply to...)
This is perversely good news for everyone that wants cheap houses. Because there will be no financing, there will be a much smaller housing market, with a lot fewer dollars spent on housing.
Nice idea- small government, I guess that there will be no Realtor sponsored donations for Shelby, as they realize how he was screwed them. Austerity is good for you!
Someday this war's gonna end...
Austerity word of the year in 2010 so perhaps the mostly assclowns in Wash DC can start putting it into practice in 2011 rather than SOP of 'extend and pretend' and kicking the can down the road
This board has long been populated by Republicans and their supporters.
This board is overwhelming left-of-center, as political compass scores have shown. There's just a few of us Libertarian types holding the middle ground.
Guess it's just tough for you to have any perspective when you're so far left everyone else is to your right.
That fit's me only because I realize I have been kept in the dark and fed $hit for so long, I'm more confused than outraged.
So how is that mushroom diet working for everyone else here?
Of course they did. It's Krugman's personal adspace to the world, sellin' mo stimulus spending to avert catastrophe. He never actually defines avert. The truth is, his formula for utopia doesn't have a very longtimeline and relies heavily on hope & luck so it' CREATES the next crisis - which by design gets worse since it's every crisis lumped all together each time since the previous one got sticksaved.
I increasingly believe the liquidationists are right.
Just how are [mortgages] going to be more difficult to get?
They are only letting one through once in a while in South Florida. Are they gonna make no mtges at all?
They can start taking back existing mortgages. Don't laugh. Think big picture of banks with ARMs and recasts as rates rise.
This board has long been populated by Republicans and their supporters
Really? I never had the feeling it was overly political in the spiteful ways many other blog comment sections can be. There is a debating of ideas here that is unlike any other blog I visit, but I think adding the label of 'republicans' vastly oversimplifies the types of people that inhabit this particular corner of the internet.
not
Sure, theres always some loud comment that you remember where one poster begins to personally attack the poster, instead of debating the ideas presented, but that is literally dwarfed by the much more intelligent conversation that I see here on a daily basis.
*Not really related to anything you said, just my .02 for the evening... now, wheres my and ?
Pardon me for pointing out who caused the Great Recession from we are now emerging.
Is the "recovery" sustainable withOUT 150 B of new debt / month, 0% interest rates, and large financial institutions "invisibly" supported by the government (TBTF)? Is it really a recovery if it's completely fake?
You, Mr. Republican, are here every day to spout your remarks that I find invariably biased and often nasty. You are not in a position to lecture anyone about decorum.
I thought a nice Christmas would change things a bit. 2 days later I log on and same old same old.
Tell me what you want me to go, and I'll tell you where I want to go. Then when we get there, we can say that someone moved to the other side of the aisle. Deal?
.
Edit: Honestly, I'm not sure where you should put me. I say give 'em gay marriage and take away Federal fund mandates for things such a drinking limit and speed limits. Let the States vote for Senators again, and remove many Federal taxes and demand that Congress ask the state legislatures for extra funds if needed. Let the students eat a decent/good meal for breakfast and lunch. Have I alienated everyone yet?
Of course not. An economy that is not creating enough "growth" to even absorb the new entrants into the workforce is not recovering. It's all debt and accounting tricks and propaganda
So far, that chart--the credit Suisse one?-- has been, surprisingly, irrelevant. What means something is under/un employment, and how far underwater you are. Some incredible percentage of mtgs are underwater here. 50% or close maybe?
When the mtg resets, the payment and rate mostly goes down.
At some point, the banks will not advance the real estate taxes any more. Then
Sure, theres always some loud comment that you remember where one poster begins to personally attack the poster, instead of debating the ideas presented, but that is literally dwarfed by the much more intelligent conversation that I see here on a daily basis.
That's all true. The vast majority of conversations in which I've participated on this board had little or nothing to do with politics.
I do remember those who have attacked me personally over the years, rather than respond to my points, and I no longer tolerate them.
So how is that mushroom diet working for everyone else here?
I'm ~55. I stopped the mushroom diet about 5 years ago; but it wasn't by choice it just happened. I get a bit pissed when I see people on here who have been off the mushroom diet for many more years than I was, and I actually know a ~30yo that isn't. Somewhat aggravating that "intelligence" doesn't always means "smart enough to know what is going on".
But, we don't get to choose our brains or how they work or how the chemicals slosh about.
i think we had a recession primarily caused by the end of consumer-credit bubble and resulting financial panic (Mad Max). TARP and a laundry list of other federal programs extinguished the financial panic, while ARRA offset some of the lack of final demand, thus creating the statistical recovery. but based on the inequality metrics, the rot is still there.
My area cannot even agree on "simple" things such as education: charter v. public so I'm not surprised that the country cannot tackle these kinds of issues. Maybe if we just put all of the "foreign-born" folks back on boats and ship 'em back to their country of origin, we can finally have a more homogeneous population that can ultimately agree on things. Although, I'm unsure what England, Ireland, Germany, China, Mexico, India, Vietnam, and various countries of Africa would think about the return of their diaspora.
The US can't handle austerity, consumption is our moral code. Certainly the Bill of RIghts isn't. People dont' want to pay taxes and think the problem is DMV workers and overpaid teachers. We are the least taxed major economy, and capital pays almost nothing.
Empire isn't cheap, 800 military bases strewn around the world and generations of wounded veterans.
Fortunately, wounded veterans can't fight well as a cohesive unit so I'm going to have to categorize that as a Feature and close this service ticket out.
I went to Winn Dixie to get Hubby and I some cold meds. Not much traffic for a Sunday. I guess everyone has too many left overs and credit card hangovers.
You, Mr. Republican, are here every day to spout your remarks that I find invariably biased and often nasty. You are not in a position to lecture anyone about decorum.
Shall I repost your explicit permission that I do indeed have both standing and position?
You really don't see how the general tenor of HCN is liberal/left? THe compass scores don't convince you? There are a few republicans and a few more conservatives and a few more than that libertarian leaning types but en toto they are numerically overwhelmed by those further left.
The US can't handle austerity, consumption is our moral code. Certainly the Bill of RIghts isn't. People dont' want to pay taxes and think the problem is DMV workers and overpaid teachers. We are the least taxed major economy, and capital pays almost nothing.
Those points do seem to be big parts of the problem and I'm not seeing any solutions being proposed other than to terminate a bunch of DMV workers and teachers. Actually, those aren't being proposed quite yet, but it seems to be the default position for states and municipalities.
I'm not surprised that the country cannot tackle these kinds of issues.
This country is over-polarized because nobody has had to decide NOT to spend on anything for along time. The debate isn't about spending or not it's about spending on your socialism or MY socialism. So, the polarized opinions are more about spite. Maybe if someday there are actual limits on how much the government can spend actual decisions will NEED to be made and people will realize what the actual topic is.
"because of a 2004 state law, Assembly Bill 489, which imposed a tax cap of 3 percent for owners of primary residences and an 8-percent cap for residences that are not owner-occupied, as well as commercial properties and raw land. That law prevented property taxes from soaring when land values were skyrocketing during the housing bubble prior to the economic meltdown."
This helps..........Next year will see assessed values plunge even more. Is there a down side? Yes, but not to me.
Empire isn't cheap, 800 military bases strewn around the world and generations of wounded veterans.
I read a piece one time from the Charleston War College whose conclusion was that wars historically cost three times as much in the aftermath as in the fighting. This does not bode well for The Forever Wars.
i think we had a recession primarily caused by the end of consumer-credit bubble
Which was orchestrated by Clinton/Rubin/Summers and further fueled by Bush and company. The US has a serious growth crisis as displayed over the last 20 years. Debt has/is the only path to show any so called growth. To blame what happened on either party or to blame either party for what's transpired since is naive and foolish. It was and continues to be a team effort.
and think the problem is DMV workers and overpaid teachers
Who thinks that?
The district administrator in my local school district will have a 434K/yr salary, matched up with a pension by the taxpayers of this wonderful state of $13M, JUST FOR HIM.
Most teachers get paid along the same unconscionable spread of pay that exists in the private sector between the top ranks and their underlings, if not worse in many cases.
That one guys pension would pay for almost 1200 teachers. The district does not even have close to that many. Teachers are not the problem.
The administrative costs are the biggest factor. Much the same problem as the private sector has. Those at the top get to decide how much to pay themselves and they work as a team to keep it that way.
People are asking if the recovery is sustainable. I'm concerned that the recession won't be sustainable. We've spent $4T and burned $9T in equity to buy 3 years in which to reform the FIRE sector. Fail.
All right. I'll acknowledge what appears to be the consensus that HCN commenters are center-left.
*
My personal sympathy for the Hugo Chavez, Revolutionaries Sect and other left-wing rioters in Greece admittedly draws everything left.
Yagij, i doubt the Modern day Pocahontas will let you in..
We can only hope. Pocahontas and her crew will have to pray that oil doesn't magically appear within that territory or all bets are off. Like the last time it happened.
.
Sadly, I'm watered down Cherokee, and while I'm genetically and generationally not far off from the Eastern tribe (~3 generations), I have some dominate Germanic traits that kill any chance of 'em letting me back on the Rez.
This country is over-polarized because nobody has had to decide NOT to spend on anything for along time. The debate isn't about spending or not it's about spending on your socialism or MY socialism.
Which is how we traveled from allowing temporary income tax cuts to expire to more spending for both sides.
school districts should use the NFL revenue model: X% of revenue should goes towards teacher salaries.
administrators want shiny buildings and more subcommittees? fine, it'll just reduce their share of the pie. instead, we have districts like mine, where over 50% of the operating budget is for administration and debt service...
An economy that is not creating enough "growth" to even absorb the new entrants into the workforce is not recovering
Demographics aren't all that favorable either. Anybody catch that piece from the 2010 census data that showed us at sub 1% average annual population growth over the last decade, lowest since the 1930s?
Unfortunately, not starting a fight isn't very male. But, if there was a limited budget: say instead of beer AND fighting it was beer OR fight then you might be able to stop fighting. Right now, who in their right (natural male) mind wouldn't want the BIGGEST fight an unlimited beer budget to go with it.
. . . districts like mine, where over 50% of the operating budget is for administration and debt service...
I'm beginning to think that is universal among districts. Administrator salaries and benefits are way out of control, but cutting teachers will likely be the 'solution' that is found.
instead, we have districts like mine, where over 50% of the operating budget is for administration and debt service...
Oh yeah. I'm sure Memphis (TN) City School system is similar which probably why the City side of the consolidation argument are running scared. I like how the leaving governor talked big and tough about the state taking over under-performing schools, but every time a Memphis city school was on the "To Be Taken Over" list, the state magically found reasons to give them 2 more years to improve things. Now that the Memphis school board has voted to tear up their charter and return the education folks to county jurisdiction, you've never seen so many grown folk show The Fear from what I'm hearing from folks there (h/t Bob D.)
Administrator salaries and benefits are way out of control, but cutting teachers will likely be the 'solution' that is found.
It took decades to break it will take decades to "fix" but the "fix" can ONLY start if there's a limit on what can be spent. Otherwise, why would anybody fix it? I wouldn't. I personally love socialism. But, I'm getting much more than I'm paying into it.
I have some dominate Germanic traits that kill any chance of 'em letting me back on the Rez.
Blessing in disguise. One of the more depressing places I've visited was Cherokee, NC (hq for eastern band of Cherokees). Terrible circumstances for people so very significant in this area's history.
I thought that Bond Girl was contrasting IL and CA with Greece's ability to roll over debt, not pay it off. Here's her reference to an article in Bond Buyer:
"There was a great article in the Bond Buyer recently discussing rollover risk in the muni market (or the relative lack thereof), which compared leverage in the muni and sovereign debt markets:
The International Monetary Fund’s Global Stability Report … focused in large part on sovereign rollover risk. The risk of a country failing to find lenders has spiked.
This is essentially what happened to Greece in May. It planned to meet an $11.9 billion bond payment by selling more bonds. As concerns about its ability to meet this payment swelled, investors grew skittish about lending the country money.
Canada needs to raise a little more than 10% of its gross domestic product to repay maturing debts through the end of next year. Italy’s needs are closer to 20% of GDP, according to the IMF report.
Japan needs to raise a little more than half of its annual economic production to pay off maturing debts. In explaining why Japan was unlikely to “dysfunction,” the IMF cited a stable investor base – not dependable tax revenues or fiscal discipline.
Contrast that with the most fiscally troubled states. According to its annual report for fiscal 2009, California is facing about $2.9 billion in debt maturities this year and a similar amount next year – less than 0.4% of the state’s GDP. Illinois will have to repay about $1.5 billion in principal this year and next, or 0.3% of its GDP.
The totality of state and local governments’ interest paid and debt retired or refinanced in 2008 was 2.4% of US GDP.
Aside from its diminutive size, what is noteworthy about this figure is how stable it is over time. In 2007, state and local governments’ interest paid plus debts retired or refinanced in 2008 represented 2.3% of US GDP. This figure has stayed between 1.97% and 2.66% since 1995."
I think the failure of Republican policies in the years to come will cause the more centrist types to lean more left as things get ever worse
I was once a conservative Republican and still count myself as a conservative.
Having said that, don't think for one moment that a true conservative can't go along with a "centrist" position. If you think otherwise, you're sadly mistaken.
The unfortunate thing is, this new crop, who call themselves "conservative," aren't conservative at all. They're wacked-out, right-wing extremists, who would fit in better at Birch Society or Klan meeting.
One of the more depressing places I've visited was Cherokee, NC (hq for eastern band of Cherokees).
Yeah, it is more of a family sadness than a financial/social one. Some people were willing to leave the tribe and marry "abroad", and the offspring were persona non grata ever since that time.
Spending limits will have to occur, but so will tax increases. If not, we will have enshrined the current inequalities into the system.
To say it can only happen if there is a limit on what can be spent is just about half of saying there must be a balanced budget. At current revenue levels, we could eliminate most of the federal government and still not balance the budget.
The house I'm lined up to buy although I haven't fully commuted to yet,
was 289k last Summer and I have a tentative offer of 210k. This was a short
sale and the bank is losing around 70k on a three year old mortgage. I my
Still unwind the transaction depending on certain conditions. This is in
Flyover country . It's going to be a tough year for everyone.
This place is just right of Huffpo, but not by much.
I love being a moderate. No one loves me until they need my vote to swing something their way and then I go back into the fat friend group until the need arises to acknowledge me once more.
The unfortunate thing is, this new crop, who call themselves "conservative," aren't conservative at all. They're wacked-out, right-wing extremists, who would fit in better at Birch Society or Klan meeting.
True. Conservatives balance budgets and therefore do not require a 'no tax' pledge to join the party.
On that potentially political note, I'll take my leave so as not to continue upsetting anyone. I think I'll take tomorrow off from the board, too, as my penance (how's that, pavel).
only 70k. A relative pittance. On one I'm working on, but not for long, the bank is set to lose about 300k. Of a mtg on which 550k is owed. 20% down too.
At current revenue levels, we could eliminate most of the federal government and still not balance the budget.
I didn't mean "limit" as balanced budget. I meant it as more broadly. Right now, the people who love government socialism (which is the Red and Blue Team together on their own fun and cool programs) know there is really no limit to what they can spend. They might have their common Kabuki dance of "the budget" but both teams know eventually they get everything they want.
There will be no limits until the country can't borrow anymore. While it can borrow there will be no limits on ANYTHING.
While it can borrow there will be no limits on ANYTHING.
Which in turn means that as long as the Fed will monetize... which also (in turn) means that as long as foreigners continue to accept USD for goods & commodities... then the ponzi continues.
I repeat. I am sooooo happy that Florida is only "close to" being a basket case.
Yeah, it's cold here, went for a walk--oh, my. But when the northeast digs out from it's blizzard there will be many who want to come where it is warm.
Having said that, don't think for one moment that a true conservative can't go along with a "centrist" position. If you think otherwise, you're sadly mistaken.
I find there is theatre in label-making/label-makers and everyone doesn't live solely in one neat little box. "Centrist"? "Progressives"? "Patriot"? . . . whose definition will we use in which debate?
The house I'm lined up to buy although I haven't fully commuted to yet,
was 289k last Summer and I have a tentative offer of 210k. This was a short
sale and the bank is losing around 70k on a three year old mortgage. I my
Still unwind the transaction depending on certain conditions. This is in
Flyover country . It's going to be a tough year for everyone.
Sporkfed.....stop wearing a skirt and white cotton panties and tell the bank you want 150k
I find there is theatre in label-making/label-makers and everyone doesn't live solely in one neat little box. "Centrist"? "Progressives"? "Patriot"? . . . whose definition will we use in which debate?
As an old-school conservative, I believe in states' rights and fiscal responsibility.
Barry Goldwater, for example, was an old-school conservative. His votes in the Senate were almost invariably centrist votes, with the exception of his vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. At the time, I thought his vote was unfortunate, but he insisted on constitutional grounds. He was made out to be a racist, which was absolutely untrue.
I was just in 7-11. The Commonwealth of VA is now charging a .50 tax on each phone card purchased. It always sucks to be poor.
I just noticed something the other day. Fast food stands in California charge sales tax on hot food. I read a sign in one of them (I think it was a Subway) that claimed the state required that sales tax be collected on hot food, but not cold food. So this means that the poor family that gets by on McDonalds food pays sales tax to eat, but people who cook at home do not.
I have heard people claim that eating at McDonalds is cheaper than cooking at home. I don't know if this is true, but the state seems to get a cut of hot meals. In the urban nutburgs, that would be a 10.25% meal tax.
Oh, the Ideology, what about moral/immoral, competent/incompetent...
there are monarchies on the Planet treating ppl better than your gov.
I came to the conclusion its not about the Ideology, but about the "Head of the Fish"
Barry Goldwater, for example, was an old-school conservative. His votes in the Senate were almost invariably centrist votes, with the exception of his vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. At the time, I thought his vote was unfortunate, but he insisted on constitutional grounds. He was made out to be a racist, which was absolutely untrue.
A national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing.
But, in the end, it all comes down to the psychology of the politicians, the joy of spending other people's money, greed, sleaze, and the host of other attributes that make leaders attractive to the peasants. So, unless there is some external limiting "force" that keeps the worst elements of the society (the nobility) in check we'll always end-up exactly where we are now: broke and the top 1% controlling all the wealth.
I read this that your property taxes have a max of 35% x 3%= coming up to 1.05% property taxes per year- so if your ranch is worth $150k, your taxes are now $1.6k per year. How does that compare with what you are paying?
I have seen the game here, and unless you get a big drop upfront, you are just riding the rates up as the curve declines to keep the cashflow of taxes flowing.
One of Goldwater's problems--in California, anyway--was he got hooked up with the Birch organization. Someone tried to explain to me once exactly how and why that happened, but I don't recall the details. The Birchers were very powerful in California and the Rockefeller contingent within the party wouldn't support Goldwater, so I think that had a lot to do with it.
I later heard it reported, in a rather tangential way, that Goldwater thoroughly regretted having involved himself with them. I really don't think he realized what they'd become by 1964.
"As 2010 draws to a close, the wealthy have turned their eyes to the future. And they're not exactly happy with what they see. In fact, there are several economic issues that are keeping high-net-worth investors up at night. These worries have had a profound impact on the investment decisions these investors have made over the past few months...Given how the wealthy are often ahead of the curve when it comes to investing and risk management, I thought it would be interesting to highlight some of the concerns and opportunities spotlighted in a recent survey of TIGER 21 members – a group of 150 wealthy entrepreneurs (most of them American), with an average net worth of $75-million.
The worry: Another market crisis
The vast majority of wealthy investors surveyed (over 70 per cent) believe markets will take a turn for the worse in the coming months. While there is a range of opinion as to how bad the pullback will be (most expect it to be between 10 per cent and 30 per cent), respondents continue to worry that choppiness will make for a challenging investment climate in the months to come."
LBJ is held in a rather low position in my view of modern presidents, and besides Guns & Butter and other policy issues that continue to haunt us to this day, the airing of the Daisy ad is a chief complaint I have for the man and his legacy.
In California, when you go in to a fast food restaurant to order and you're asked whether your meal is for here or to go, the reason why is not just because the workers need to know whether you get a tray or a bag with your food. Under the state's unusual sales and use tax regulations, what you order and where you'll be eating it determines the amount of taxes, if any, you pay on your meal.
Take-Out Food
Under regulation 1603 of California's sales and use tax regulations, sales tax should be assessed on hot food products that are sold as to-go orders at fast food restaurants. The amount of the tax is the standard state sales tax rate. However, take-out orders of cold food, like veggie sandwiches, ice cream and doughnuts, are exempt from taxation under state rules.
Take-Out Drinks
Regulations state that the state sales tax does not apply to hot beverages that are sold to go, like coffee and cappuccino. It does apply however, to cold drinks, like carbonated soda and lemonade.
Dine-In Food
Sales tax applies to all hot prepared food products that are sold for immediate consumption, either at or near the fast food restaurant selling the food. This does not apply to food that is sold in large enough quantities that they are obviously not intended for immediate on-premises or near-premises consumption.
Dine-In Drinks
Most hot drinks and cold drinks alike that are ordered for dining in at fast food restaurants are taxed, but the state has created exceptions for water and juices.
Guaifenesin, excellent. This is to expel the drip from stomach and lungs. Drip is good -- sign of decongesting cavity. You do not want to "dry up" the mucus in the cavity.
To accelerate decongestion:
1. STEAM. And I mean, concentrated. Either sit in a (tight as you can make it) bathroom with shower running for twenty min 3x/d. OR inhale from warm water vaporizer (towel over head. BE CAREFUL TO KEEP MIN 18" from vent). Stick VICKS® in each nostril while you're at it. Perform as direct until you've got unobstructed breath, mouth closed. FWIW, my old man was a family doc and prescribed this to infants and adults before all others.
2. SALT WATER DROPS. 1/8 tsp per 100ml warm water ~85F. 2 - 3 drops per nostril, supine, as needed to induce VIOLENT SNEEZE. LIMIT 3x/d -- say, every 6 hours.
3. LIMIT DAIRY CONSUMPTION. Drink only clear fluids. NO NOG. (Toddies of TEA, LEMON, HONEY best for low-grade fever.) If you must have milk, get a quart of skim or 1% to add.
BONUS: echinacea tincture. It's pricey per oz but you only need 2-3 drops 2x/d in clear liquid (while healing) or other beverage to boost yer auto-immune. You'll get accustomed to the buzz on your tongue. Start tomorrow and continue throughout the so-called flu season. Send hubby west with his own bottle.
if i got the cold i do this:
- wrap myself in 3 layers of cloth
- drink hot beer or hot redwine with lots of Honey/sugar ( beware.. not so hot to let the Alcohol evaporate)
- i drink till i fall asleep..
-repeat 2 - 3 times (the drink part)
I will allways be working fit after 2 days!!!
The Guaf really helps quite a bit. I can breathe freely right now but there is still pressure up in my cheek so I know there is still congestion there. I know I'm not supposed to be doing the dairy thing but I was being bad.
Ultimately, the Birch Society will implode the Republican Party , just as it did in '64.
Even Specter commented on the "cannibalism" evident in the Republicans now. The same was true in '64, but I guess Specter didn't notice it then because he was too busy cooking up the single bullet theory.
taxes and fees in California make me think of the 'boiling frogs' analogy -
how much can you guys take?
Already reached the limit for me, at which I have adjusted my shopping behavior to minimize the impact of sales taxes. Think of it as the Laffer curve in action.
Well gee, you could organize a protest, raise a stink and demand that the salary be cut, and if you have the political support, the administrator's salary can be reduced by the government that pays it. Contracts are probably short.
You can not reduce the salary of a CEO unless you own the corporation. Even if you are Congress.
You expect government to be run well without your input and oversight. If pensions are absurd, bring an action or petition for redress. But if you think pensions should be limited by law for government workers, why do you not consider Dimon and Blankfein government workers? Why shouldn't their bonuses be limited. And why do you not care whether you're being taken for a hundred grand or a hundred million?
Clearly Bond Girl disagrees with Whitney (I'll side with Bond Girl). - CR
Me too. Or I would if I understood her posts. Her übernerdiness is well beyond my pay grade.
Clearly Bond Girl disagrees with Whitney (I'll side with Bond Girl). There will be defaults, but they probably will not lead to anything on the scale that Whitney is predicting with "hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of defaults".
The issue is containment. While the much higher than normal defaults over the next two years are entirely market events the danger lies in tying to prevent them from occurring. That way leads to moral hazard as other municipalities will attempt to eschew their responsibilities.
States are probably in more trouble than cities.
States will withhold shared funding and cities will file BK.
Although no matter how much the states keep in funding - it won't be enough.
There will be massive job cuts for all states, cities and counties.
Many services will be cut or stopped, starting of course with kids, elderly and the handicaped.
Over the holidays, there was a conversation at the table about a list that was published in a fairly popular newspaper, with the 100 most likely cities to default. A nearby large area was in there(over 150K pop)
Ill have to see if I can find that link...
scone wrote:
Bond Girl has one thing wrong however. She cites the supposedly low level of indebtedness of most US states and municipalities. The debt she uses is out of context. If California only had California's debt we'd be rich beyond even Sacramento's avarice.
Bond Girl wrote a good post on bonds. I actually grasped part of it. There are basically two types of muni bonds. One is paid by an existing revenue stream. One is paid by taxes.
I was just in 7-11. The Commonwealth of VA is now charging a .50 tax on each phone card purchased. It always sucks to be poor.
Rob Dawg wrote:
I don't get it.
Explain please.
That is included in my austerity measures for next year, josap. People are under some illusion that those tax cuts they all just got are going to save them. They aren't going to be so happy next year when they find out how they're going to pay for them. Everyone wants government workers pay cut or jobs eliminated. This will result in more unemployment, less spending and more misery for everyone but the top 2%. At some point we reach the breaking point. Will the cops be excited about stopping riots when they had their pay slashed and benefits cut?
That is the Arizona model. We will steal, beg, and borrow at the state level, and the municipalities will bear the burden, and some bonds will go unpaid. Wilbur Ross will lose some money insuring that dreck, but so be it.
I suspect the first big city in AZ to blow will be Glendale- their finances thanks to the stadium deals is in pathetic shape.
As for the nation, let there be layoffs!!!
Galtistan is an anarchosyndicalist collective run with a rotating executive council....
Someday this war's gonna end...
Hopefully Bond Girl will show up and answer questions. Her posts are great.
Obviously this is a difficult problem to analyze. There are so many local issues, and it is important to understand the funding sources.
The NY Times had a commentary on this today:
EDITORIAL; The Looming Crisis in the States - NY Times
It is clearly a problem.
Best to all
Rob Dawg wrote:
Bell, Oxnard, Vallejo (sp?) are already in the "bad debt" camp. Who else is in it?
josap wrote:
Ditto.
nova wrote:
The system seems to be set up so that once you become poor, you stay poor.
josap,
Yeah, I know. You can have one bad year and it will take you three to catch up.
I am confused and that is probably no surprise to many of you. What I can't understand is that is they any coinnection between the governments pension obligations and its bond obligation, If there is it would seem that according to many and perhaps Bond Girl too Mish is sounding the trumpet over pension problems at least a year away and the inference is probably more. In other words Mish don't get them in a twist. If Mish is correct would not a bankruptcy pull down the bonds too. In other words does the pension problem as seen by Mish impact on the bond problem and if not why not? I told you I am confused. Thank you.
Rob Dawg wrote:
Yes, it most certainly is.
I'll be sure not to stand under the exit sign when Bond Girl feels it necessary to file for a writ of mandamus.
Mom, he's trading on insider information ! Cos while http://www.businesspundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/zzwhitney.jpg is public information the other isn't.
On the other hand this is also public information: Meredith Whitney Recycling ... : Meredith Whitney Husband Photos, Wallpapers, Galleries -
Hmm.. given that I'd...
It has always been that way, as it is hard to accumulate enough to just rent a house while just scraping by. Any illness, or bad behavior pretty much scuttles any chance to make it back into the working class, let alone the middle class.
The hard part is to keep gaining any savings when so many things come up and knock you back. I have seen a lot of people climb out, but painfully over time. I have also seen a lot crash and burn, never to really surface. When adversity is encountered, people find out what kind of friends and family they have invested in, and what kind of safety net they have.
Ironically, a lot of the rich crash harder than the rest of us, because they thought they were immune- Randy Quaid comes to mind. The VF article this month about being chased by starwhackers is priceless.
Someday this war's gonna end...
I side with Meredith Whitney although don't think it will as severe.
$2tn debt crisis threatens to bring down 100 US cities | Business | The Guardian
New Jersey governor Chris Christie summarised the problem succinctly:
"We spent too much on everything. We spent money we didn't have. We borrowed money just crazily. The credit card's maxed out, and it's over. We now have to get to the business of climbing out of the hole. We've been digging it for a decade or more. We've got to climb now, and a climb is harder."
and CR does NOT even mention this problem in his post
State Pension Problems Are Billions Worse Than Advertised
California is the worst state in absolute terms. In per capita terms, Illinois appears to be in the worst shape. However that statement does not factor in all of New Jersey's pension plans. Then again, the Biggs report does not include all of Illinois' public pension plans either. The mess everywhere is far bigger than it looks.
Basket cases = CA, IL, NY, NJ, OH, TX
Close to basket cases = FL, PA
"It is clearly a problem"
umm..it's clearly a dilemna, there fixed that for you, and errr....not if you're a bond holder.
Hark! Hubster Dude
has got the generator working, just in case it really is Snowpocalypse!
Yay scone! It's pretty darn chilly down here today as well. Yesterday was rainy and cold but today we at least had some sun. I'm thinking fireplace and eggnog this evening.
scone wrote:
Very good!!!!
Hope you don't need it, very glad it works just in case you do.
Guess the question is "Who holds the bonds of cities (or states) most likely to default?"
What is the domino effect when the bond holders no longer have those assets or the cash flow they depended on?
some will say the Fed will bailout states like CA, IL, NY
Yeah right when....
Fed Treasury Holdings: $1,000,341,000,000 | zero hedge
$24.5 Trillion In US National Debt, $144 Trillion In Unfunded Liabilities In... 2015 | zero hedge
And most importantly why the hell should taxpayers in the other 42 states pay for these basket case and close to basket cases that have allowed their state and local gubmint citizens to live large for past 30 yrs.
I think "watertight compartment" every time I hear the word "contained."
"Contained" for whom? Goldman Sachs, maybe.
The rest of us are going to drown.
Thanks, guys. Alas, no eggnog for me, I'm already on a post-feast diet. However, RADAR kinda looks like a lot of the storm will pass NE of Cape Cod, right through Martha's Vineyard. I could be wrong.
EDIT: Boston, MA weather | Boston.com
I imagine it will cut into the after Christmas retail sales numbers a bit.
There won't be any domino, as the Fed will step in with Tarp 3, to bail out yet another class of bond holders
josap- that is my liquidation of the rentier.
Rich folks and retirees own most of the muni bonds in America because of the tax benefits.
That loss of income and wealth will be a very interesting effect.
Someday this war's gonna end...
If bonds collapes in a waterfall effect, not even GS is safe.
scone wrote:
Snowing pretty good here scone. I just checked the weather buoy about 25 miles offshore. The barometer is dropping like a rock and the winds are pretty strong. I already see some drifts approaching 2 to 3' while other areas are bare due to the high wind.
Marine Buoy Forecast : Weather Underground
any reason self-evident.org uses SSL encryption?
I am with you km4 no one is mentioning let alone considering the impact of the the pension problem. It appears that the pension problem in this context is as the Sainted Poret said it like the crazy aunt in the attic. Thank you.
Citizen AllenM wrote:
They will make awkward introductions as they join us in the tent camps?
barbadkatte wrote:
After layoffs and pension haircuts. Never let a crisis go to waste
I still get the feeling that large number of quasi-state bonds are papering over their shortfalls with creative accounting. Just hoping and praying it will work out before they have to report how bad it really is.
Will 2011 be a big enough bumper crop of tax payers money to make that happen is the real question for me at least.
josap wrote:
Yep, but "essential" services will be maintained--such as subsidizing commercial air flights. While city employees have been laid off, city streets get less maintenance, the new water treatment plant (for which a general obligation bond levy raised funds) has a 2 million cost overrun (partly because somehow the planners managed to ignore known geologic instabilities in the new plant's location), and maintenance of city parks is neglected (said parks are used by the all important tourists, so maintenance "matters") a city council member can still say he thinks the city can "find" enough money to continue a 1 1/2 year state subsidy of 4 commercial flights to PDX. At this time, the subsidy comes to a little over $110/per passenger/per flight.
The 10 passenger plane (and you don't go through any security procedures to board) carries an "average" of 3.5 passengers/flight.
It's important to keep your priorities straight in these parlous days.
km4 wrote:
Because when the time came to make a decision to be an independent state, or suck off the teet of big govt EVERY STATE chose to suck on that teet.
Show me the one state that decided to make its own drinking law, and turned down the federal funding that required the states set the law at the recommended 21 yrs old.
Taking from a national pool of money also means they are on the hook in bad times too. sorry.
Nova knows about security and attempts to ensure his site is secure?
Kauai_Kahuna wrote:
Given the current political climate, I can very easily see a repeat of '08 in all of this.
I can easily see a bunch of pissed off Republicans refusing to offer the guarantee, the containment.
Just like Lehman brothers, but much bigger.
I can see that.
azurite wrote:
Whos brother in law owns that airline/plane?
What a total waste.
Bond default is BB's line in the sand. Will never allow that to happen as it would set a very unfortunate precedent in his mind no matter if it is muni, state, or federal. He and Timmay wouldn't be able to fund debt with more debt if nobody had any confidence in said debt. Look for some very creative ways (printing) to literally paper over any cracks if and when they appear. Of course these will have consequence later but who cares about later.
mp wrote:
Be sure to vote on what to name the sequel. What should the title of the sequel be? | Hoocoodanode?
You noticed, eh?
Well, things will change, when enough is lost.
Until then, suffer away in a declining environment.
Plus, now we get the cheapo boomer retirement coming on board.
Someday this war's gonna end...
mp wrote:
Why would the Republicans be pissed off? You mean House Republicans will stonewall the Senate Republicans?
As I understand it Tommy Vu that in order to give the pensions a haircut you legally need a bakruptcy. Now won't a bankruptcy have impact on those muni bonds? Thank you.
yagij, thanks. Coffee has not kicked in yet.
Mike in Long Island wrote:
That makes sense, 25 miles east of Montauk, to the edge of Cape Cod. Nantucket is going to be hit hard, I guess.
Basel Too worte:
Of course, if it violated the 90-10 standard, they should face compensation caps too.
Whether private Harvard should lose non-profit tax status is certainly topical, but distinct from the issue of whether for-profit colleges should keep large government subsidies.
nincompoop wrote:
This is Amerika. Laws mean nothing
yagij wrote:
Because they're always pissed off.
Yup, good bet that one. I have some folks ready to start
operations coming into the AZ Legislature next week.
I fully expect
to start here, as we tell folks to drop dead. Literally.
Someday this war's gonna end...
Mike how does one check a weather buoy. Thank you.
mp wrote:
You should have seen them at this year's county Republican party. Never did I see a bunch of happier people. It is almost like they are doing good things locally! (which is wrong)
.
On the bright side, the local Republican party may be a good driver for bringing out a 3rd party/non-partisan vote for county & metro affairs--thanks to the state Republican party.
Tommy Vu wrote:
Filtering mechanism creating barriers of entry into the real crime syndicates, which don't like competition.
Citizen AllenM wrote:
Love it - Galtistan - we are all Johns now!
nincompoop wrote:
Marine Weather Forecast and Fishing Charts | BUOYWEATHER.COM
dryfly wrote:
At least in NoLA, being a John can land you a Summons instead of an arrest.
?
They are almost always on some website.
National Data Buoy Center
Here is Hawaii's.
NDBC - Hawaiian Islands Recent Marine Data
Well, some folks see an orderly resolution to this mess; I don't.
All I see is another major shitstorm on the horizon.
Have a great day!
Radiofax Charts - Boston
mp wrote:
I can't - its their buddies at the country clubs holding the bonds. Way too close to home to stand in the way of that crowd.
But maybe some union pension will squeal first - just so as to give them some cover.
CR, let me answer questions 6 through 1 for you: "everything is going to be fine". There. I made your job easier for you.
dryfly wrote:
Anonymous johns at that - just another wallet
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
At least our whores will let us keep our johnsons afterwards... I hope (h/t mp)
I'm having eggnog...with Captain Morgan Spiced Rum. The congestion from my cold/sinus infection or whatever it is that's been making me miserable for a week has moved from my eye to my teeth. I'm not sure if that's progress or not. Hubby is sick now, too. We tried to watch the new Wallstreet movie last night using On Demand with Comcast but for whatever reason the movie never did play. I tried to get a free one and that didn't work either. Hopefully they won't charge me the 4.99 for the movie we didn't get to see.
josap wrote:
When this town & another on the coast (the small towns filed for the state transportation grant jointly) initially asked for bids from airlines to handle these flights, the process down here was so suspect that (due to pressure from the city commissioners in the other town--which had just gotten through a political influence scandal) the bidding process was redone. A different airline other than the one initially favored by a few members of my city's council was chosen. Since then the airport manager has been fired (after a previous mess during which he was placed on administrative leave--and the city manager left & a city council member quit early after a closed council session), & last I heard was suing the city for unjust termination, and the hired airline has violated one provision of its agreement (one that some think was kinda important) but the city's attorneys had ever so intelligently failed to include a monetary PENALTY for violating/failing to comply with this provision . . . ..
It's nobody's bro-in-law, but when the city council (in closed sessions) decided to buy the stupid airport several years ago (2007 or 2008) so it wouldn't go under, I thought it was mostly because they wanted to make sure they & their well off friends had a place to keep their planes & helicopters and socialize. Even better if the taxpayers in this city of about 12,000-13,000 subsidized their costs.
Just before the then airport manager was placed on administrative leave, a FAA guy from PDX came down, took a little tour of the airport (it's a small general aviation airport) and told me what a "well run airport" it was.
Some basic math:
US Muni Bond Market size 2.7 trillion ( source Roubini),
Cumulative default rate: .001 to .003 ( source wiki )
That gives 2.7 billion to 8.1 billion - which is where Joe Mysack is at so I can see where he's coming from. But thats using past history - right until it isn't ( that isn't just a cute phrase, nor is past performance is no predictor of future performance). Given that I can see where Mysack is coming from, and that these are definitely not ordinary times and that the process is:
2(a) Only after they are thoroughly pissed off, (2b)do you shaft Mr. MoneyBags.
1 is already happening. 2.a not yet..
What's the election cycle for munipical elections?
I need to understand that before I side with the Whitney view
My school district will have an administrator getting over 430K/yr salary, 13M in pension
RevolutionWillN... wrote:
Don't let yogi know. It is only those evil for-profit institutions that need to be trimmed and culled off of the gov't's dime.
RevolutionWillN... wrote:
Why do you think we're keeping Wal*Street around? We all need someone to point at so we can get away with our own smaller scale heists.
yagij wrote:
Unless they're union, in which case the bloke deserves all he can chisel
nincompoop wrote:
Follow this link - this one happens to by to buoy number 44025 which is located about 25 miles south of the middle of long island.
Marine Buoy Forecast : Weather Underground
You can use this link Marine Weather : Weather Underground to select a region and once you do that you can drill down to forecasts for both nearshore and offshore. Within the drill down area you will see blue dots that when you put your mouse pointer over them will display a number for that buoy - click on it and it will give you a variety of weather and sea state data.
Have fun.
EDIT I see AB and KK beat me to it. That's what I get for responding before reading thru to the end.
That should buy a bag or two of dogfood.
So what?
Isn't it obvious that obligations beyond reality won't be paid?
When we Weimar, and it is when in my mind, no longer if, we will settle these with money worth darn near nothing. Because the folks in charge think they can kick the can a little further.
Someday this war's gonna end...
Citizen AllenM wrote:
These people vote too - fun times - make the teabaggers look like boy scouts.
See ya - gonna go to a hockey game where the violence really is 'contained'. Get to sit outside the glass and drink - be a very different experience to be sitting among them dodging pucks and bodies, trying not to spill... like in the economy.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
I was going to go there 'cause I've already been tagged as a shill and apologist. I'm just thankful I wasn't tagged a Conservative and/or Liberal!
.
You would think that voters would start bristling anytime someone talks about Education or "For The Children", but we aren't there yet. Either we have too many children, too many people's salaries tied to children, or too much time to obsess about other people's children. We can only hope those IL pensions will get axed and all those poor administrators will get only to keep their millions in salary over the years of their employment.
azurite wrote:
josap wrote:
If that didn't reek of corruption and kickbacks, I don't know what does. No biggie 'cause I'm starting to side with AllenM. Hello, Weimar, here we come! Just like where we started from!
yagij wrote:
Some municipalities are definitely doing better with hotel tax (transient occupancy tax) and sales tax. Some new businesses are filling the holes that Mervyn's and American automakers left, but I still see a lot of small businesses and strip mall businesses going under.
From the raw numbers, the Illinois pension looks to be the worst of all the states, with NJ and CA also in a big hole. The politics in each state will determine who will pay for the pension losses (pensioners or tax payers or some combination). It looks like NJ is going to force some losses on pensioners.
Off to see True Grit. Jeff Bridges is having a moment.
I read that linked Vanity Fair article. Wow. Thanks skk--think it was him.
Parts of it sound like Pavel.
Parts of it sound like Pavel.
?
Comrade Canadie... wrote:
QE3 will be for municipal debt, is my take.
I should qualify the "doing better" part for municipalities. Most still have hiring freezes, deferred or no COLAs, and many are actively working on a two tier pension system with new hires getting lower benefits. Lower future property taxes will be another hit so it really is a mixed bag.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Always look for the Union Liable.
Oh, that the Greeks have totally lost any sense of community and are done to every person for himself/his family/herfamily.
Including a monastery on Mount Athos where the monks did some stuff which they clearly don't think was wrong, but apparently was. Read the article.
Rob Dawg wrote:
troll
scone wrote:
"True Grit" as done by the Coen Brothers... I'm tempted.
Rob Dawg wrote:
and who amongst us would posit no cascade effect, pin action to CDS, after CDS leaned against another, inextricably woven to a fabric stretched to the point of tensile strength
I haven't seen a thing to convince me that any public debtholders will take haircuts. I'd turn it around on Meredith and ask why she thought moral hazard would stop at this particular high-water mark.
Read the article.
Thanks but no thanks. I doubt that Vanity Fair knows a monastery from a mezze.
99 weeks of bond fund inflows have come to an end, and the bond bull is gasping shallow breaths. Even Pimco has had its fill. Seems to me like it doesn't really have to do with anything other than identifying the turn. You can shout taxing authority till you are blue in the face, but the money is no longer going to chase bonds until such time as panic out is fully recognized by Mr Market, and then when all the little chicken littles have crowded the exits will the slippery foxes sneak in for a fill of golden eggs.
I saw True Grit last night. Thought it was pretty good.
As to the muni and state bond defaults, the Fed gov
will print,print, print, with the appropriate string attached
so that power flows to DC. That is one stimulus that
will stave off deflation. If they don't, Katie bar the door.
My church is about to make a deal with a nonprofit developer to build "affordable" senior housing on some unused property adjacent to the church complex. The usual deal: investors receive federal tax credits, the developer manages and controls the development for 50 years, the church gets a little something up front and title in 50 years. I've been through this before with another congregation.
Churches like to go with senior housing in deals like this because, well, a plurality of the congregation often is senior, and they're seen as less trouble around the campus than low-income families or the handicapped.
The problem with this class of senior housing is hitting the sweet spot; prospective residents have to make less than X amount per year to qualify, but the rent is still too expensive for most of the people who'd otherwise qualify. It's hard to keep places like this full. And yet the developer's happy to charge ahead full speed; the financing is there, after all. I guess nonprofit developers aren't any different than the for-profit type in that regard. This particular outfit is a bit of an empire-builder. Just hoping this particular empire doesn't collapse.
fully recognized by Mr Market, and then when all the little chicken littles have crowded the exits will the slippery foxes sneak in for a fill of golden eggs.
Not a criticism of your economics, but is there a mixed metaphor award - like a plaque or a cup or something?
pavel.chichikov wrote:
I think you're barking up the wrong alley, Pavel.
volker the viking wrote:
California may only have "California" debt service amounts Sold/Not Yet Repaid: ~$65 billion. , Approved/Not Yet Sold: ~$54 billion but they are also responsible for ~20% of the Fed $12T and its residents are also responsible for their local municipal debt and all this in an already crushing tax environment.
Any excessive failure and as you say; cascade contagion. And make no mistake, the Pimpcos of the world will use any market stress to rip off the rest of the market. Never waste a crisis.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
What scared me was, that I think I understood what he said. Or at least ment.
Oh, no, don't be prejudiced, it's really interesting.
Churches like to go with senior housing in deals like this because, well, a plurality of the congregation often is senior....
Our Archdiocese here in the DC area has been very successful at this sort of project for decades.
There are also the very much in play Little Sisters of the Poor, who when things get tough simply beg and wait on God's Providence. It seems to work very well. Their senior residences from what we've seen on a visit are means tested and very attractive and well run - cheerful, actually.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
OK, since it directly leads to:
No doubting Thomas ( one of the lesser known ( wonder why
) disciples - who can name all 12 ? ) here - no siree.
For the others: here's the article again ( does VF have -ve connotations - how weird - its not as if we are buying Playboy for the "articles" is it ? )
Beware of Greeks Bearing Bonds | Business | Vanity Fair
And we had a Greek who was in the commentariat who I asked to critique that article - and s|he said - yeah that's pretty much how it is.
I think you're barking up the wrong alley, Pavel.
But there's a light at the end of the alley. I think it's an oncoming garbage truck.
Rob Dawg wrote:
that's their evil plan, and since they have the biggest book in the world, they can pretty much engineer the event
I honestly think that Pavel would like the article.
As a (former) title atty, I am fasinated by the fact that the Greeks have no title registry system at all. And the monks dug up some really ancient deed from 600 or so years ago, and then played swap the land with the government.
It sound like, effectively, there is no government in Greece, and hasn't been since. . . . who knows when?
The monks are really just the hook for the story.
skk wrote:
Thirteen. It's like the Beatles.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
I want classical music, and there must be open spaces and wildlife, and running open, free waters
I'm not going to read an article that from the beginning tells me what I already knew, calls Jesus Prayer beads "prayer beads", and doesn't go to Mount Athos to attend a Mass.
volker the viking wrote:
See? I'm not a stupid as everyone keeps saying. And they are going to get away with it too.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
Sometimes it's just New Jersey.
John Stewart
I want classical music, and there must be open spaces and wildlife, and running open, free waters
Me too. Well, I'll settle for a bit less if I have to.
Rob Dawg wrote:
of course you're not
volker the viking wrote:
Sunrise Earth : Discovery HD Theater
Better than blood pressure medicine.
It isn't clear to me from the article that the monks actually did anything morally wrong, mostly the appearance of impropriety, and the Greek gov't & society is such a morass of corruption that you can't exist there without being morally wrong. Kinda like the Soviet Union, actually.
I think you are fixating on trivialities and missing a good article.
Rob Dawg wrote:
it was an allusion to Edward G. Robinson in Soylent Green
Rob Dawg wrote:
Those are awesome.
I have heard similar stories from multiple sources . Meredith came in to discuss her rersearch with a major fim hich has a big muni research staff.
After several hours, they were convinced she didn't know what she was talking about.
volker the viking wrote:
So was the reference to "medicine."
I have to pile in a bit on the "Today its all about Money crowd
".
Got news for you: it is called CAPITALism for a reason.
If it would be about People and Society it would be called SOCIALism..
Not that hard really...
Btw, ever wondered why Capitalism got really ugly AFTER the fall of the Soviet Union??
My Theorie is they didnt need to compete with the social part anymore...
Rob Dawg wrote:
Jeez ! I googled it before I said it - I'm a doubting Thomas for sure.. and I got this - no not from the wiki, from a JesusMary site:
Who were the twelve (12) disciples / apostles of Jesus Christ?
Maybe I should have trusted the wiki - which adds on Barnabas, Andronicus, Junia, Silas, Timothy and Apollos. ( although it goes on to add a dozen or more for later centuries )
But I thought - wiki, yeah right what do they know.. lets stick to what's from the horses mouth ( and confirmation bias of course ) .
So, who's the 13th then ? Jesus doesn't count ( but he does save) - that's reflexive.
All in good humor of course.
some investor guy wrote:
there's a cadre working a spin with a hidden agenda
Rob Dawg wrote:
no, just Edw. G.
John Hussman's Most Radical Belief: It Wasn't The Bailout That Saved Us From A Great Depression
**We did not avoid a second Great Depression because we bailed out financial institutions. Rather, the collapse in the economy and the surge in unemployment were the direct result of a gaping hole in the U.S. regulatory structure that prevented the rapid restructuring of insolvent non-bank financials. Policy makers then inappropriately extended the "too big to fail" doctrine to ordinary banks. Following a striking loss of public confidence that resulted from arbitrary policy responses, coupled with fear-mongering by exactly those who stood to benefit from public handouts, the self-fulfilling crisis was contained by a change in accounting rules that effectively disabled capital requirements for all financial companies. **
We are now left with a Ponzi scheme.

pavel.chichikov wrote:
HA ! you did read it! Gotc
ha..
skk wrote:
was he crippled?
skk wrote:
Matthias.
volker the viking wrote:
Good point. I just automatically read it as in those fatal error messages one gets ( not me of course, my code is 100% USDA certified as error free) - "Invalid page" ( hmm I think Mark Foley said that ) , "Invalid handle" ( jeez I think Mark foley said THAT too ) . I'll stop as I can sense I'm moving into 4chan mode.
skk wrote:
Sounds like the MicroSoft apostle.
Just a question....what is stopping California from just defaulting?
a gaping hole in the U.S. regulatory structure
You might call it that.
Regulatory failure may very well be the proximate cause of the crisis.
Rob Dawg wrote:
Ahh, The substitute for Judas Iscariot Thanks. I didn't know they used soccer rulez. ( old ones, yeah I know you can have 2 substitutes nowadays).
pavel.chichikov wrote:
I'm of the opinion that Regulatory Enhancement may be the better term. It was hands-off by design for eight long years.
Which is worse ... wrote:
Fear of the future if they did. Plus, one would assume that one person couldn't make a decision like this. As a rule of thumb, if there is more than one person involved there will be disagreement and politics involved. Politics will keep all problems involving pain from being solved.
some investor guy wrote:
Yeah well, on the inside of the big gov machine, I wouldn't put a penny in most of the muni's in Arizona.
Period.
Big staff or not.
Finances are a wreck, a total wreck, with debt on top of debt.
Someday this war's gonna end...
It was hands-off by design for eight long years.
Could you prove it in court?
pavel.chichikov wrote:
It's already been proven in the court of public opinion, . . . excluding of course those who only view Faux News.
sportsfan wrote:
True. Obama then showed his true colors with the Geithner appt. and Bernanke re-nomination.
Citizen AllenM wrote:
Yep, and I think they used up all the accounting tricks, push backs, pull forwards, check the couch cushions they can manage. Cut services big time, raise fees big time, beg for tax increases or raise if a vote not needed, is what 2011 will be all about.
We should stop having sovereigns and state governments and just had corporations instead.
I wonder how many of us here feel anxiety about their own personal financial circumstances. I'm not at all suggesting a poll. But perhaps such personal concerns might very well influence the mood in this forum.
Tommy Vu wrote:
In case you missed it, the Republicans complained about the evils of 'regulation' in virtually every bill passed by the 111th Congress.
Still, substantial legislative progress was made, despite the carping, including the Dodd-Frank (Financial Reform) Bill.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
Of course they do, how could it be any other way? We all see the world from our own small viewing stand first. Sure we can see larger landscapes, but those are colored by our own background lighting.
sportsfan wrote:
There was probably no other path to take. The mantra of deregulation was easy to preach as most people can't comprehend (refuse to admit) how corrupt and sleazy those at the top (the MOST worthy of society and our dear leaders) really are. So, selling the deregulation to worshipping peasants wasn't very hard.
Cut services big time, raise fees big time, beg for tax increases or raise if a vote not needed, is what 2011 will be all about.
Big trouble for the low wage earners. Gas 3.10 at the pump in DC this morning. Trouble right there with what one might call a fee and a tax. Cuts net income to the bone and beyond for low wage people.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
Low income brackets always get hit first and worst.
Sad, true.
Give more if you have it.
For those thinking DC is interested in further bailouts...
D.C. & Mortgages | zero hedge
Two seemingly unrelated developments in the nations mortgage mess this past week. They both point to how difficult it will be to bring some stability back to the system. I am wondering if they are connected.
...
The first came as a surprise to me. Mr. Joseph Smith was supposed to be confirmed as the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Authority. Smith was a state banking commissioner from North Carolina. He was a White House pick. Up until last week I thought he was a shoe-in for the job. Kaboom.
Smith is out. Nixed at the last minute by none other than Richard Shelby (R. AL). The ranking member of Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs waved his arms and sent Smith back to North Carolina. Senator Shelby had this to say:
'Shelby's main concern was that Smith would be a “lapdog” to outside pressure to use the GSEs, at taxpayer expense, as vehicles for large-scale homeowner assistance programs.'
...
The CBO did have one recommendation that I thought could be very useful. They want the government to recognize UP FRONT a mark to market cost of providing a mortgage. This cost would go on the budget as a current expense. The Administration and Congress would fight over all aspects of the budget (as usual) but if they had an agenda for housing (stimulus/support) they would have to appropriate the money and vote on it where all could see the results.
...
If you’re a conservative and you want to see a smaller role for government the CBO proposal on mortgages is the ticket for you. I can’t help but connect the dots between Shelby’s "no" vote on Thursday and the CBO report from the same day.
sportsfan wrote:
What regulation? The day Dodd-Frank passed, the TBTF's stocks were up , what 2-3%?
pavel.chichikov wrote:
I suspect that when things "get bad" I will be screwed financially. There will be some event in the future which will essentially steal the remaining loot from the savers to "save society". It must happen. The nobility can spread their loot around the globe, the peasants can't.
sportsfan wrote:
O gawd here we go again - the
team takes to the field to point out that, rabid, fleabitten, crippled mangy though it may be, its STILL a dog. It may emit smelly farts but since its by the
team it smells of roses.
O well, have at it.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
Civil or criminal court?
civil - yes
outside pressure to use the GSEs, at taxpayer expense, as vehicles for large-scale homeowner assistance programs
thin line between affordability and assistance programs...
I'm living both lives.
From limping along with my law practice in Miami, and listening to all the horrible stories, to returning here where the house is paid for, the credit card bills are nearly always paid before any interest accrues, and can pretty much buy what I like. At this point I would like less clutter!
The cognitive dissonance is weird.
BTW, Jim the Realtor covered a CR-like subject:
Moving In With Family | bubbleinfo.com
Which is worse ... wrote:
Inertia and the perception that there's still loot and sheeple to shear and a feeling that there's always packing up the kids and escaping. There's also 10m here who aren't exposed to the consequences because they are consumers not producers and another 5m who are above being touched.
Yeah, on thinking about it, I am less mad at O than I was.
There will be some event in the future which will essentially steal the remaining loot from the savers to "save society".
It would be foolish to deny the possibility.
Tommy Vu wrote:
It's not Dodd-Frank outlawed them. It's called regulation, not extermination.
I for one who is doing very well, (on track at least) am very anxious over my personal finances. I have been poor, working class and what most would call middle class and I realize how easily I can fall all the way down again.
My response for the last four to five years has been to eliminate debt just because I no longer trusted the banks to play fair. Then I started saving like a miser. Getting no return, but I have finally gotten to or above the levels of savings that is recommended by most people. Some are just far too extreme, and seems to think everyone needs 10 million to retire. Who knows, they may be right.
skk wrote:
fine... ( to answer your earlier question from the last thread
)
Crooks and Liars
B of A Grabs Domain Names in Anticipation of WikiLeaks Release | Crooks and Liars
Many of the comments in that thread show just how far into nevernever land many blogs in the die-hard
camp are...
? I've seen more pleasant discourse in their comment sections recently, and Im not afraid to admit that I read both of them with as unbiased an eye as possible.
(edit: because many posters are asking what was the original poster thinking to come to that conclusion, not because the comments are that way)
as far as the
Basel Too wrote:
Wonder how many of the unemployed took the loans from the gov to pay the mortgage for up to 2 years. Full recourse, ugly payment plan later, lots of paper work to fill out, do many qualify?
another 5m who are above being touched.
For now?
Good piece and hopefully a real not fake
Something along the lines described by the CBO is coming. Barney Frank does not have the influence or the votes to stop it. Strong hands like Shelby will get their way. While the actual outcome is cloudy there is one conclusion you can take to the bank. Mortgages are going to be more difficult to get and they will cost more in twelve months. That will hurt, but it is a good thing.
And IMO a slap in the face to Ben 'the QE pusher' Bernank
Basel Too wrote:
LMAO! Those two words bear nothing in common; it's only corruption of the language that puts'em anywhere in the same room
As far as housing is concerned, affordability would be a reality if it weren't for all the government assistance.
shucks darn - my property taxes will decrease. It's about time.
Nothing found for News Property-values-plunge Comment-page-1 #comment-11149
Black Star Ranch wrote:
Thats 'The Kingdom of Nye' for all the late night radio fans in the 90's
Kauai_Kahuna wrote:
If the nobility can use the Fed to create inflation (hidden or real) to force the peasants to payoff their debts your "safe investments" might mean you will need 10 million to retire. The method used to steal will be very simple and invisible to the peasants (as it must be). The predator humans will eat as many of the prey as they need to survive.
I just clicked on fhe Michelle Bachmann ad. There's nothing specific on it in terms of policy that I can see, besides repealing some things.
Does anyone actually know how to climb out of this trench?
Dinner time. ciao.
km4 wrote:
And housing values will go where?
And how many more will be underwater?
And how many more jobs lost?
And how many more homes lost?
Pushing values where?
I wish everyone with a mortgage would just stop paying in January. Then we can get this over with after a few years of GDII
This is perversely good news for everyone that wants cheap houses. Because there will be no financing, there will be a much smaller housing market, with a lot fewer dollars spent on housing.
Nice idea- small government, I guess that there will be no Realtor sponsored donations for Shelby, as they realize how he was screwed them. Austerity is good for you!
Someday this war's gonna end...
skk wrote:
Perhaps you missed the context. Tommy Vu, a well know long time Obama basher (who claims to have been an Obama supporter up until two months BEFORE he was inaugurated), had to bash Obama in a rather gratuitous fashion in response to my comment about regulatory inaction under the previous administration.
My response to which you took exception was to point out to him (while ignoring his gratuitous bashing) that the Republicans in Congress still did all they could over the past two years to complain about anything remotely connected with regulation of any kind.
This board has long been populated by Republicans and their supporters. Bitch, bitch, bitch is all they do, perhaps all they can do. Pardon me for pointing out who caused the Great Recession from we are now emerging.
BTW, in response to CR's blog post, Obama's ARRA is looking better every day. It just wasn't large enough to get us all the way back, but then the Republican senators whose votes were needed to pass it at all put a hard cap on the number of dollars.
These are just the facts. Sorry if you find them upsetting.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
As it always has appeared, so it seems now. Mrs. Defarge is knitting.
sportsfan wrote:
TBTF means only one thing. And regulation isn't relevant for a TBTF anything. When something is TBTF other force are at work.
Really, I thought most posters here were uber-liberal?
TJ and The Bear wrote:
Are we talking about housing, higher education, or health care?
Just how are they going to be more difficult to get?
They are only letting one through once in a while in South Florida. Are they gonna make no mtges at all?
pavel.chichikov wrote:
At this point it is so complicated, I think we might have to just start over. Although doing that is a complete disaster as well.
WASS
sportsfan wrote:
There is no pardon and certainly no excuse for the tone, tenor and direction with which you present your political biases.
Kauai_Kahuna wrote:
The Red and Blue Team true-believers both feel under siege. I think the site tends to be weighted toward the Blue Team but overall pretty balanced.
Most posters here are undescribable.
lawyerliz wrote:
Florida is weird. People can get mortgages in KaLi.
Austerity word of the year in 2010 so perhaps the mostly assclowns in Wash DC can start putting it into practice in 2011 rather than SOP of 'extend and pretend' and kicking the can down the road
sportsfan wrote:
This board is overwhelming left-of-center, as political compass scores have shown. There's just a few of us Libertarian types holding the middle ground.
Guess it's just tough for you to have any perspective when you're so far left everyone else is to your right.
NOTaREALmerican wrote:
In Galtistan, the only Red & Blue we have are the lashes from the whips and the bruises from the clubs.
That fit's me only because I realize I have been kept in the dark and fed $hit for so long, I'm more confused than outraged.
So how is that mushroom diet working for everyone else here?
pavel.chichikov wrote:
For a decade now, my career - not just this specific job - could disappear at any time. For me, the Nazcrash never really ended.
Contrary to what one would imagine, living the life of Wesley doesn't get any easier over time.
Everyone to the left of me is far left.
Everyone to the right of me is far right.
Isn't it obvious?
CalculatedRisk wrote:
Of course they did. It's Krugman's personal adspace to the world, sellin' mo stimulus spending to avert catastrophe. He never actually defines avert. The truth is, his formula for utopia doesn't have a very longtimeline and relies heavily on hope & luck so it' CREATES the next crisis - which by design gets worse since it's every crisis lumped all together each time since the previous one got sticksaved.
I increasingly believe the liquidationists are right.
lawyerliz wrote:
They can start taking back existing mortgages. Don't laugh. Think big picture of banks with ARMs and recasts as rates rise.
km4 wrote:
If you Google "Austerity" you will find stories on Europe, not the US. I think we will get austerity for our 2011 word.
Guess you missed next month's article- tax rates to go up to stop shortfalls.
Wanna bet?
Someday this war's gonna end...
"Guess it's just tough for you to have any perspective when you're so far left everyone else is to your right."
I haven't really seen much "perspective" or willingness to change ones views from either side of the aisle on hcn.
I thought a nice Christmas would change things a bit. 2 days later I log on and same old same old.
sportsfan wrote:
Really? I never had the feeling it was overly political in the spiteful ways many other blog comment sections can be. There is a debating of ideas here that is unlike any other blog I visit, but I think adding the label of 'republicans' vastly oversimplifies the types of people that inhabit this particular corner of the internet.
not
Sure, theres always some loud comment that you remember where one poster begins to personally attack the poster, instead of debating the ideas presented, but that is literally dwarfed by the much more intelligent conversation that I see here on a daily basis.
*Not really related to anything you said, just my .02 for the evening... now, wheres my
and
?
sportsfan wrote:
Is the "recovery" sustainable withOUT 150 B of new debt / month, 0% interest rates, and large financial institutions "invisibly" supported by the government (TBTF)? Is it really a recovery if it's completely fake?
josap wrote:
Financial Armageddon: "Do I Feed the Kids or Pay the Utilities?"
A lecture from the master of the snide remark.
You, Mr. Republican, are here every day to spout your remarks that I find invariably biased and often nasty. You are not in a position to lecture anyone about decorum.
poic wrote:
Tell me what you want me to go, and I'll tell you where I want to go. Then when we get there, we can say that someone moved to the other side of the aisle. Deal?
.
Edit: Honestly, I'm not sure where you should put me. I say give 'em gay marriage and take away Federal fund mandates for things such a drinking limit and speed limits. Let the States vote for Senators again, and remove many Federal taxes and demand that Congress ask the state legislatures for extra funds if needed. Let the students eat a decent/good meal for breakfast and lunch. Have I alienated everyone yet?
NOTaREALmerican wrote:
Of course not. An economy that is not creating enough "growth" to even absorb the new entrants into the workforce is not recovering. It's all debt and accounting tricks and propaganda
yagij wrote:
New or Fair?
You mean foreclosing?
You mean not having them due on sale?
So far, that chart--the credit Suisse one?-- has been, surprisingly, irrelevant. What means something is under/un employment, and how far underwater you are. Some incredible percentage of mtgs are underwater here. 50% or close maybe?
When the mtg resets, the payment and rate mostly goes down.
At some point, the banks will not advance the real estate taxes any more. Then
RevolutionWillN... wrote:
That's all true. The vast majority of conversations in which I've participated on this board had little or nothing to do with politics.
I do remember those who have attacked me personally over the years, rather than respond to my points, and I no longer tolerate them.
Kauai_Kahuna wrote:
I'm ~55. I stopped the mushroom diet about 5 years ago; but it wasn't by choice it just happened. I get a bit pissed when I see people on here who have been off the mushroom diet for many more years than I was, and I actually know a ~30yo that isn't. Somewhat aggravating that "intelligence" doesn't always means "smart enough to know what is going on".
But, we don't get to choose our brains or how they work or how the chemicals slosh about.
i think we had a recession primarily caused by the end of consumer-credit bubble and resulting financial panic (Mad Max). TARP and a laundry list of other federal programs extinguished the financial panic, while ARRA offset some of the lack of final demand, thus creating the statistical recovery. but based on the inequality metrics, the rot is still there.
volker the viking wrote:
My area cannot even agree on "simple" things such as education: charter v. public so I'm not surprised that the country cannot tackle these kinds of issues. Maybe if we just put all of the "foreign-born" folks back on boats and ship 'em back to their country of origin, we can finally have a more homogeneous population that can ultimately agree on things. Although, I'm unsure what England, Ireland, Germany, China, Mexico, India, Vietnam, and various countries of Africa would think about the return of their diaspora.
pavel,
Perhaps you ought to put up a poll with options based upon relative level of anxiety?
The US can't handle austerity, consumption is our moral code. Certainly the Bill of RIghts isn't. People dont' want to pay taxes and think the problem is DMV workers and overpaid teachers. We are the least taxed major economy, and capital pays almost nothing.
Empire isn't cheap, 800 military bases strewn around the world and generations of wounded veterans.
Basel Too wrote:
Yeah, we've added astronomical debt to irreparable rot. Such a deal.
purple wrote:
Fortunately, wounded veterans can't fight well as a cohesive unit so I'm going to have to categorize that as a Feature and close this service ticket out.
NOTaREALmerican wrote:
Sure, my 401k is back up. My brother in law found a job and I spent too much at the mall.
On the not snarky side, people make judgements depending on their own small part of the universe.
I went to Winn Dixie to get Hubby and I some cold meds. Not much traffic for a Sunday. I guess everyone has too many left overs and credit card hangovers.
sportsfan wrote:
Shall I repost your explicit permission that I do indeed have both standing and position?
You really don't see how the general tenor of HCN is liberal/left? THe compass scores don't convince you? There are a few republicans and a few more conservatives and a few more than that libertarian leaning types but en toto they are numerically overwhelmed by those further left.
At some point, the banks will not advance the real estate taxes any more.
just have the TBTF buy all the tax certificates with non-recourse debt from the Fed.
wow, yagij, you want to give US America back to the Natives??
Just WOW...
purple wrote:
Those points do seem to be big parts of the problem and I'm not seeing any solutions being proposed other than to terminate a bunch of DMV workers and teachers. Actually, those aren't being proposed quite yet, but it seems to be the default position for states and municipalities.
yagij wrote:
This country is over-polarized because nobody has had to decide NOT to spend on anything for along time. The debate isn't about spending or not it's about spending on your socialism or MY socialism. So, the polarized opinions are more about spite. Maybe if someday there are actual limits on how much the government can spend actual decisions will NEED to be made and people will realize what the actual topic is.
Citizen AllenM wrote:
.....
This helps..........Next year will see assessed values plunge even more. Is there a down side? Yes, but not to me.
purple wrote:
I read a piece one time from the Charleston War College whose conclusion was that wars historically cost three times as much in the aftermath as in the fighting. This does not bode well for The Forever Wars.
Basel Too wrote:
Which was orchestrated by Clinton/Rubin/Summers and further fueled by Bush and company. The US has a serious growth crisis as displayed over the last 20 years. Debt has/is the only path to show any so called growth. To blame what happened on either party or to blame either party for what's transpired since is naive and foolish. It was and continues to be a team effort.
purple wrote:
Who thinks that?
The district administrator in my local school district will have a 434K/yr salary, matched up with a pension by the taxpayers of this wonderful state of $13M, JUST FOR HIM.
Most teachers get paid along the same unconscionable spread of pay that exists in the private sector between the top ranks and their underlings, if not worse in many cases.
That one guys pension would pay for almost 1200 teachers. The district does not even have close to that many. Teachers are not the problem.
Maury the Credi... wrote:
Well, the Forever War will be "cheap" then. Three times infinity is still infinity. A bargain!
Yoringe wrote:
Well, most of the Natives are dead so when we return a 2nd time we can conquer it without all that bloody trail of tears stuff.
*Tommy Vu wrote:
ding ding
All right. I'll acknowledge what appears to be the consensus that HCN commenters are center-left.
Yagij, i doubt the Modern day Pocahontas will let you in..
The administrative costs are the biggest factor. Much the same problem as the private sector has. Those at the top get to decide how much to pay themselves and they work as a team to keep it that way.
People are asking if the recovery is sustainable. I'm concerned that the recession won't be sustainable. We've spent $4T and burned $9T in equity to buy 3 years in which to reform the FIRE sector. Fail.
*Yoringe wrote:
If it is Califonia, there will a long environmental review process before you can move back in....
Comrade Kristina wrote:
Yes, which is what I would do too if there was an unlimited amount of other people's money to spend.
Rob Dawg wrote:
"Concerned"? C'mon, Dawg, tell us what you REALLY feel.
p.s.: And yes, I noticed that you said "recession".
*sportsfan wrote:
Maury the Credi... wrote:
Cheaper to keep fighting.
How about not starting?????
Yoringe wrote:
We can only hope. Pocahontas and her crew will have to pray that oil doesn't magically appear within that territory or all bets are off. Like the last time it happened.
.
Sadly, I'm watered down Cherokee, and while I'm genetically and generationally not far off from the Eastern tribe (~3 generations), I have some dominate Germanic traits that kill any chance of 'em letting me back on the Rez.
NOTaREALmerican wrote:
Which is how we traveled from allowing temporary income tax cuts to expire to more spending for both sides.
"I have some dominate Germanic"
))
blame it on the Vikings who discovered America
school districts should use the NFL revenue model: X% of revenue should goes towards teacher salaries.
administrators want shiny buildings and more subcommittees? fine, it'll just reduce their share of the pie. instead, we have districts like mine, where over 50% of the operating budget is for administration and debt service...
Tommy Vu wrote:
Demographics aren't all that favorable either. Anybody catch that piece from the 2010 census data that showed us at sub 1% average annual population growth over the last decade, lowest since the 1930s?
I think the failure of Republican policies in the years to come will cause the more centrist types to lean more left as things get ever worse
my 2 cents -
josap wrote:
Unfortunately, not starting a fight isn't very male. But, if there was a limited budget: say instead of beer AND fighting it was beer OR fight then you might be able to stop fighting. Right now, who in their right (natural male) mind wouldn't want the BIGGEST fight an unlimited beer budget to go with it.
barfly wrote:
wow, just wow
Basel Too wrote:
I'm beginning to think that is universal among districts. Administrator salaries and benefits are way out of control, but cutting teachers will likely be the 'solution' that is found.
Basel Too wrote:
Oh yeah. I'm sure Memphis (TN) City School system is similar which probably why the City side of the consolidation argument are running scared. I like how the leaving governor talked big and tough about the state taking over under-performing schools, but every time a Memphis city school was on the "To Be Taken Over" list, the state magically found reasons to give them 2 more years to improve things. Now that the Memphis school board has voted to tear up their charter and return the education folks to county jurisdiction, you've never seen so many grown folk show The Fear from what I'm hearing from folks there (h/t Bob D.)
sportsfan wrote:
It took decades to break it will take decades to "fix" but the "fix" can ONLY start if there's a limit on what can be spent. Otherwise, why would anybody fix it? I wouldn't. I personally love socialism. But, I'm getting much more than I'm paying into it.
yagij wrote:
Blessing in disguise. One of the more depressing places I've visited was Cherokee, NC (hq for eastern band of Cherokees). Terrible circumstances for people so very significant in this area's history.
Is the infection in your chest yet? Are you coughing phlem?
I thought that Bond Girl was contrasting IL and CA with Greece's ability to roll over debt, not pay it off. Here's her reference to an article in Bond Buyer:
"There was a great article in the Bond Buyer recently discussing rollover risk in the muni market (or the relative lack thereof), which compared leverage in the muni and sovereign debt markets:
The International Monetary Fund’s Global Stability Report … focused in large part on sovereign rollover risk. The risk of a country failing to find lenders has spiked.
This is essentially what happened to Greece in May. It planned to meet an $11.9 billion bond payment by selling more bonds. As concerns about its ability to meet this payment swelled, investors grew skittish about lending the country money.
Canada needs to raise a little more than 10% of its gross domestic product to repay maturing debts through the end of next year. Italy’s needs are closer to 20% of GDP, according to the IMF report.
Japan needs to raise a little more than half of its annual economic production to pay off maturing debts. In explaining why Japan was unlikely to “dysfunction,” the IMF cited a stable investor base – not dependable tax revenues or fiscal discipline.
Contrast that with the most fiscally troubled states. According to its annual report for fiscal 2009, California is facing about $2.9 billion in debt maturities this year and a similar amount next year – less than 0.4% of the state’s GDP. Illinois will have to repay about $1.5 billion in principal this year and next, or 0.3% of its GDP.
The totality of state and local governments’ interest paid and debt retired or refinanced in 2008 was 2.4% of US GDP.
Aside from its diminutive size, what is noteworthy about this figure is how stable it is over time. In 2007, state and local governments’ interest paid plus debts retired or refinanced in 2008 represented 2.3% of US GDP. This figure has stayed between 1.97% and 2.66% since 1995."
barfly wrote:
I was once a conservative Republican and still count myself as a conservative.
Having said that, don't think for one moment that a true conservative can't go along with a "centrist" position. If you think otherwise, you're sadly mistaken.
The unfortunate thing is, this new crop, who call themselves "conservative," aren't conservative at all. They're wacked-out, right-wing extremists, who would fit in better at Birch Society or Klan meeting.
Maury the Credi... wrote:
Yeah, it is more of a family sadness than a financial/social one. Some people were willing to leave the tribe and marry "abroad", and the offspring were persona non grata ever since that time.
Here is the link to Bond Girl's post:
Differentiating between policy and debt crises « self-evident
The Vikings got chased out by the Skraelings.
Spending limits will have to occur, but so will tax increases. If not, we will have enshrined the current inequalities into the system.
To say it can only happen if there is a limit on what can be spent is just about half of saying there must be a balanced budget. At current revenue levels, we could eliminate most of the federal government and still not balance the budget.
The house I'm lined up to buy although I haven't fully commuted to yet,
was 289k last Summer and I have a tentative offer of 210k. This was a short
sale and the bank is losing around 70k on a three year old mortgage. I my
Still unwind the transaction depending on certain conditions. This is in
Flyover country . It's going to be a tough year for everyone.
This place is just right of Huffpo, but not by much.
RockyR wrote:
I love being a moderate. No one loves me until they need my vote to swing something their way and then I go back into the fat friend group until the need arises to acknowledge me once more.
mp wrote:
True. Conservatives balance budgets and therefore do not require a 'no tax' pledge to join the party.
On that potentially political note, I'll take my leave so as not to continue upsetting anyone. I think I'll take tomorrow off from the board, too, as my penance (how's that, pavel).
only 70k. A relative pittance. On one I'm working on, but not for long, the bank is set to lose about 300k. Of a mtg on which 550k is owed. 20% down too.
sportsfan wrote:
I didn't mean "limit" as balanced budget. I meant it as more broadly. Right now, the people who love government socialism (which is the Red and Blue Team together on their own fun and cool programs) know there is really no limit to what they can spend. They might have their common Kabuki dance of "the budget" but both teams know eventually they get everything they want.
There will be no limits until the country can't borrow anymore. While it can borrow there will be no limits on ANYTHING.
It's mostly still in my sinuses but I bought cold meds with Guaifenesin when I went earlier. It's helping quite a bit.
NOTaREALmerican wrote:
Which in turn means that as long as the Fed will monetize... which also (in turn) means that as long as foreigners continue to accept USD for goods & commodities... then the ponzi continues.
I repeat. I am sooooo happy that Florida is only "close to" being a basket case.
Yeah, it's cold here, went for a walk--oh, my. But when the northeast digs out from it's blizzard there will be many who want to come where it is warm.
mp wrote:
I find there is theatre in label-making/label-makers and everyone doesn't live solely in one neat little box. "Centrist"? "Progressives"? "Patriot"? . . . whose definition will we use in which debate?
sporkfed wrote:
Sporkfed.....stop wearing a skirt and white cotton panties and tell the bank you want 150k
Bid the least amount you can make your mouth say.
Rob Dawg wrote:
Anything right of the HuffPost or D-Kos is hard right.
Black Star Ranch wrote:
As an old-school conservative, I believe in states' rights and fiscal responsibility.
Barry Goldwater, for example, was an old-school conservative. His votes in the Senate were almost invariably centrist votes, with the exception of his vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. At the time, I thought his vote was unfortunate, but he insisted on constitutional grounds. He was made out to be a racist, which was absolutely untrue.
After all the banks are too dumb to distinguish between a loss and a big a$$ loss.
Come on take it down another 10%. 189k. 100k off. It's symbolic.
Yep, met the hub at a Barry Goldwater meeting.
Sigh.
nova wrote:
I just noticed something the other day. Fast food stands in California charge sales tax on hot food. I read a sign in one of them (I think it was a Subway) that claimed the state required that sales tax be collected on hot food, but not cold food. So this means that the poor family that gets by on McDonalds food pays sales tax to eat, but people who cook at home do not.
I have heard people claim that eating at McDonalds is cheaper than cooking at home. I don't know if this is true, but the state seems to get a cut of hot meals. In the urban nutburgs, that would be a 10.25% meal tax.
lawyerliz wrote:
Take the Jim the Realtor approach -- tell them your offer declines 10K every week they don't accept.
sportsfan wrote:
Conservatives have no problem with spending and debt. Investing for the future is a hallmark of conservatism. Sometimes that means using debt.
Rob Dawg wrote:
A national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing.
Alexander Hamilton
sm_landlord wrote:
I'm tempted to write, "You don't get out much, do you?"
But I won't.
It's been that way in CA for decades.
Oh, the Ideology, what about moral/immoral, competent/incompetent...
there are monarchies on the Planet treating ppl better than your gov.
I came to the conclusion its not about the Ideology, but about the "Head of the Fish"
mp wrote:
Remember the "Daisy" attack ad?
YouTube - Democrat Daisy TV ad for 1964 Presidential Campaign
Goldwater was also made out to be Dr. Strangelove, which he was anything but.
I'm in Bratislava this evening, and thinking of the following:
1990s: Czechoslovakia
2010s: Belgium
The negotiating continues after the home inspection.
Which is worse ... wrote:
Who gets the debt?
picosec wrote:
No, actually I don't.
Yes, but only recently have I started thinking about sales tax policy, as the rates get more and more extreme.
Rajesh wrote:
But, in the end, it all comes down to the psychology of the politicians, the joy of spending other people's money, greed, sleaze, and the host of other attributes that make leaders attractive to the peasants. So, unless there is some external limiting "force" that keeps the worst elements of the society (the nobility) in check we'll always end-up exactly where we are now: broke and the top 1% controlling all the wealth.
Rajesh wrote:
When the voters partition at referendum, do they care?
sm_landlord wrote:
That ad scared the hell out of my parents. I don't recall it, but I remember them talking about it. Goldwater's gonna blow-up the world!
geographyofarecession
I read this that your property taxes have a max of 35% x 3%= coming up to 1.05% property taxes per year- so if your ranch is worth $150k, your taxes are now $1.6k per year. How does that compare with what you are paying?
I have seen the game here, and unless you get a big drop upfront, you are just riding the rates up as the curve declines to keep the cashflow of taxes flowing.
Someday this war's gonna end...
One of Goldwater's problems--in California, anyway--was he got hooked up with the Birch organization. Someone tried to explain to me once exactly how and why that happened, but I don't recall the details. The Birchers were very powerful in California and the Rockefeller contingent within the party wouldn't support Goldwater, so I think that had a lot to do with it.
I later heard it reported, in a rather tangential way, that Goldwater thoroughly regretted having involved himself with them. I really don't think he realized what they'd become by 1964.
A peek into the coming year through wealthy lenses - The Globe and Mail
Dec. 26, 2010 5:49PM EST - excerpts
"As 2010 draws to a close, the wealthy have turned their eyes to the future. And they're not exactly happy with what they see. In fact, there are several economic issues that are keeping high-net-worth investors up at night. These worries have had a profound impact on the investment decisions these investors have made over the past few months...Given how the wealthy are often ahead of the curve when it comes to investing and risk management, I thought it would be interesting to highlight some of the concerns and opportunities spotlighted in a recent survey of TIGER 21 members – a group of 150 wealthy entrepreneurs (most of them American), with an average net worth of $75-million.
The worry: Another market crisis
The vast majority of wealthy investors surveyed (over 70 per cent) believe markets will take a turn for the worse in the coming months. While there is a range of opinion as to how bad the pullback will be (most expect it to be between 10 per cent and 30 per cent), respondents continue to worry that choppiness will make for a challenging investment climate in the months to come."
NOTaREALmerican wrote:
LBJ is held in a rather low position in my view of modern presidents, and besides Guns & Butter and other policy issues that continue to haunt us to this day, the airing of the Daisy ad is a chief complaint I have for the man and his legacy.
picosec wrote:
Months since the last changes.
In California, when you go in to a fast food restaurant to order and you're asked whether your meal is for here or to go, the reason why is not just because the workers need to know whether you get a tray or a bag with your food. Under the state's unusual sales and use tax regulations, what you order and where you'll be eating it determines the amount of taxes, if any, you pay on your meal.
Take-Out Food
Under regulation 1603 of California's sales and use tax regulations, sales tax should be assessed on hot food products that are sold as to-go orders at fast food restaurants. The amount of the tax is the standard state sales tax rate. However, take-out orders of cold food, like veggie sandwiches, ice cream and doughnuts, are exempt from taxation under state rules.
Take-Out Drinks
Regulations state that the state sales tax does not apply to hot beverages that are sold to go, like coffee and cappuccino. It does apply however, to cold drinks, like carbonated soda and lemonade.
Dine-In Food
Sales tax applies to all hot prepared food products that are sold for immediate consumption, either at or near the fast food restaurant selling the food. This does not apply to food that is sold in large enough quantities that they are obviously not intended for immediate on-premises or near-premises consumption.
Dine-In Drinks
Most hot drinks and cold drinks alike that are ordered for dining in at fast food restaurants are taxed, but the state has created exceptions for water and juices.
Read more: California Fast Food Tax Laws | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/list_6776720_california-fast-food-tax-laws.html#ixzz19GdMDocd
This is part of why in California WASS.
Guaifenesin, excellent. This is to expel the drip from stomach and lungs. Drip is good -- sign of decongesting cavity. You do not want to "dry up" the mucus in the cavity.
To accelerate decongestion:
1. STEAM. And I mean, concentrated. Either sit in a (tight as you can make it) bathroom with shower running for twenty min 3x/d. OR inhale from warm water vaporizer (towel over head. BE CAREFUL TO KEEP MIN 18" from vent). Stick VICKS® in each nostril while you're at it. Perform as direct until you've got unobstructed breath, mouth closed. FWIW, my old man was a family doc and prescribed this to infants and adults before all others.
2. SALT WATER DROPS. 1/8 tsp per 100ml warm water ~85F. 2 - 3 drops per nostril, supine, as needed to induce VIOLENT SNEEZE. LIMIT 3x/d -- say, every 6 hours.
3. LIMIT DAIRY CONSUMPTION. Drink only clear fluids. NO NOG. (Toddies of TEA, LEMON, HONEY best for low-grade fever.) If you must have milk, get a quart of skim or 1% to add.
BONUS: echinacea tincture. It's pricey per oz but you only need 2-3 drops 2x/d in clear liquid (while healing) or other beverage to boost yer auto-immune. You'll get accustomed to the buzz on your tongue. Start tomorrow and continue throughout the so-called flu season. Send hubby west with his own bottle.
Best wishes.
hot food and cold drinks...
cold food and hot drinks...
sm_landlord wrote:
VenCo has the lowest. Welcome. If you can call 8.25% low. Excepting Oxnard and Hueneme which have an extra 0.50%.
if i got the cold i do this:
- wrap myself in 3 layers of cloth
- drink hot beer or hot redwine with lots of Honey/sugar ( beware.. not so hot to let the Alcohol evaporate)
- i drink till i fall asleep..
-repeat 2 - 3 times (the drink part)
I will allways be working fit after 2 days!!!
mp wrote:
Goldwater, the John Birch Society, and Me
taxes and fees in California make me think of the 'boiling frogs' analogy -
how much can you guys take?
The Guaf really helps quite a bit. I can breathe freely right now but there is still pressure up in my cheek so I know there is still congestion there. I know I'm not supposed to be doing the dairy thing but I was being bad.
Ultimately, the Birch Society will implode the Republican Party , just as it did in '64.
Even Specter commented on the "cannibalism" evident in the Republicans now. The same was true in '64, but I guess Specter didn't notice it then because he was too busy cooking up the single bullet theory.
barfly wrote:
Already reached the limit for me, at which I have adjusted my shopping behavior to minimize the impact of sales taxes. Think of it as the Laffer curve in action.
Tommy Vu wrote:
Well, I'm glad to see someone else recognizes what a threat they are.
The damned Birchers are corrosive, absolutely corrosive.
hot beer?! Holymarymutteragott.
Well gee, you could organize a protest, raise a stink and demand that the salary be cut, and if you have the political support, the administrator's salary can be reduced by the government that pays it. Contracts are probably short.
You can not reduce the salary of a CEO unless you own the corporation. Even if you are Congress.
You expect government to be run well without your input and oversight. If pensions are absurd, bring an action or petition for redress. But if you think pensions should be limited by law for government workers, why do you not consider Dimon and Blankfein government workers? Why shouldn't their bonuses be limited. And why do you not care whether you're being taken for a hundred grand or a hundred million?